What is the age of the universe in billions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the term "billion" in the context of the age of the universe, specifically whether it refers to 14 billion years as 14,000,000,000 or 14,000,000,000,000. Participants explore the differences between the long and short scales used in various countries and how these definitions impact numerical understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the universe is 14 billion years old, questioning whether this is 14,000,000,000 or 14,000,000,000,000.
  • Several participants confirm that 14 billion is equivalent to 14,000,000,000 or 1.4x1010.
  • Discussion arises about the historical use of long and short scales, with one participant explaining that the long scale used to define a billion as a million million, while the short scale defines it as a thousand million.
  • Another participant expresses a preference for the long scale, arguing that it seems more logical to define a billion as a million million.
  • Some participants express confusion about the definitions and the implications of using different systems, with one questioning the logic behind the standard three orders of magnitude per name.
  • There is mention of the convenience of the standard naming system, despite it not accommodating terms for ten thousand million or one hundred thousand million.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the numerical value of 14 billion as 14,000,000,000, but there is disagreement regarding the definitions of billion and trillion based on the long and short scale systems. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which system is more logical or preferable.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference historical changes in numerical definitions and the ongoing confusion that arises from differing systems in various countries. The discussion highlights the limitations of language in conveying large numbers and the assumptions underlying numerical terminology.

ofeyrpf
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,

The Universe in 14 billion years old.

Is that then:

14,000,000,000,000 or 14 million million as in 1.4x1013 years old

or

14,000,000,000 or 14 thousand million as in 1.4x1010 years old

(I know a billionaire has a thousand million 1,000,000,000)

Thanks,
 
Space news on Phys.org
14 billion is 14,000,000,000, IE 1.4x1010
 
14 billion would be 1.4x1010

and 14,000,000,000

in millions that would be 14 thousand millions
 
Part of the confusion from this comes from the fact that Europe used to use Long scale in which every named number (billion, trillion etc) over a million was a million times bigger than the one before. A billion would be a million million, a trillion would be a million billion etc.

In the US they used Short scale where it was 1000 times bigger. At some point in the 20th Europe switched but you still find people in the UK at least who are old and stubborn enough to try and stick to the old system.
 
depends on what country you come from ;)

but generally accepted is 1 billion = 1000 million or 1 x 109

see wiki for this...

long and short scales

scroll down a bit for a good table of valuesDave
 
Great thank you all
 
Ryan_m_b said:
... you still find people in the UK at least who are old and stubborn enough to try and stick to the old system.

That's a funny comment. The old system seems more logical to me. A billion should be a million million. (I'm not from the UK nor the US.)

Then a trillion is a thousand billion, 1,000,000,000,000 = 1.0 x 1012

Thanks,
 
ofeyrpf said:
That's a funny comment.
The UK is a mish-mash of systems in the oddest of ways.

ofeyrpf said:
The old system seems more logical to me. A billion should be a million million. (I'm not from the UK nor the US.)

Then a trillion is a thousand billion, 1,000,000,000,000 = 1.0 x 1012
Not sure I follow, why would a billion be a million million but a trillion a thousand million? The standard 3 orders of magnitude per name seems to make more sense to me.
 
I should not have written "Then..." as I didn't mean for the second statement to follow on from the first. I was just guessing at what a trillion is.

I think the standard 3 orders of magnitude per name is convenient but it doesn't allow for ten thousand million or a one hundred thousand million. Those numbers don't exist like that then I suppose. (Of course those quantities exist)
 
  • #10
ofeyrpf said:
I should not have written "Then..." as I didn't mean for the second statement to follow on from the first. I was just guessing at what a trillion is.
It's 1 with twelve zeros: 1,000,000,000,000. The link provided above for long and short scale has some tables.
ofeyrpf said:
I think the standard 3 orders of magnitude per name is convenient but it doesn't allow for ten thousand million or a one hundred thousand million. Those numbers don't exist like that then I suppose. (Of course those quantities exist)
You can say it and people will still understand but otherwise you're correct, every time you get to 1000x more you use a different word. It's a bit easier to say one-hundred-trillion than one-hundred-thousand-billion or one-hundred-million-million etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K