What Is the Angle Between Photon Momentum and Initial Motion in Pi Meson Decay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the decay of a neutral pi meson into two photons and the subsequent analysis of photon momentum and energy in high-energy particle interactions. The subject area includes concepts from particle physics and relativistic kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of angles related to photon momentum and the energy requirements for particle reactions. There are attempts to apply four-momentum conservation and Lorentz invariance in their reasoning.

Discussion Status

Some participants are verifying calculations and discussing potential errors in their approaches. There is acknowledgment of differing results regarding the angle between photon momentum and initial motion, with suggestions to double-check calculations. Guidance is offered on using proper notation and assumptions in the context of the second problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion arising from the use of factors of c in calculations and the importance of clear equation formatting. There is also mention of the need for algebraic manipulation to solve for unknowns in the second problem.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
A neutral pi meson, rest mass 135 MeV, decays symmetrically into two photons while moving at high speed. the energy of each photon in the lab system is 100 MeV.
find the angle 'a' in the lab system between the momentum of each photon and the initial line of motion.

the answer in the book is 42 degrees, but i found that it's 39.88 or something like that, here's my solution the initial four momentum is: (E/c,P)=(2E_ph,P1+P2)
now by using lorentz invariant here:
M_pi_rest^2*c^2=(E/c)^2-P^2=(4E_ph^2/c^2-(P1+P2)^2)
and we know that E_ph/c=P1=P2
so we get (2E_ph^2/c^2)-(E_ph/c)^2*cos(a)=M_pi^2c^2
from there i calclulated the angle, but didn't get 42 degrees, perhaps the book is outdated and this accounts for the rounding up.

any advice as to wether i got it confused or the book?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i have another question, not quite sure if i got it right.
A high energy photon (gamma ray) collides with a proton at rest. A neutral pi meson is produced according to the reaction:
gamma photon+ proton=> proton+neutral pi meson
What is the minimum energy the gamma ray must have for this reaction to occur? the rest mass of a proton is 938 MeV and that of the neutral pi meson is 135 MeV.
well again I am using here four-momentum:
before the reaction: P=(E'/c+m_p*c,E'/c) where E' is the energy of the photon.
now after the reaction we have P'=(E1/c,p_1)+(E2/c,p_2) where 1 is the proton and 2 is the pi meson, now from this we have the equations:
(E'/c+m_p*c)^2-(E'/c)^2=(E1/c+E2/c)^2-(p1+p2)^2
(E1/c)^2-p1^2=(m_p*c)^2
(E2/c)^2-p2=(m_pi*c)^2
p1+p2=E'/c
E'/c+m_p*c=(E1+E2)/c
after rearranging i get the next equation (i reming you that i need to find E'):
2E'*m_p=(m_pi*c)^2+2(E1*E2)/c^2-2p1p2
now here is where I am stuck, i need to replace p1 and p2 and also E1 and E2, but it has to be some nasy algebraic manipulation, how to get my head over it?

thanks in advance.
 
I get 42.45°. Perhaps double-check your calculations starting from m_\pi{}^2 = 2 E_\gamma{}^2 - 2 E_{\gamma}{}^2 \cos \alpha, which I also got.

Disclaimer: I omitted all factors of c. Think I should explicitely note it since it often seems a source of confusion.

EDIT: Got a bit confused over your non-use of tex. You forgot the factor 2 at the cos-term stemming from (\vec p_1 + \vec p_2)^2 = \| \vec p_1 \| + \| \vec p_2 \| + \mathbf{2} \| \vec p_1 \| \vec p_2 \| \cos \alpha, either as a typo due to the badly readable ASCII or in your calculation.
 
Last edited:
ok, i see where i got my mistake, forgot the two, in the term with the cosine, thanks.
can you help me with the next question?

p.s
welcome aboard, i see you're new to the forums, it's a great site, hope you'll enjoy your stay here.
 
You should really use tex to display your equations - makes your posts much more readable (especially when considering your relatively condensed posting style) and therefore makes it more likely that someone will take the time reading them and possibly replying, then.

Two remarks on the 2nd problem:
- Since you're explicitely keeping factors of c, there's an error in your "P=...": The first E'/c should be an energy, i.e. only E'.
- I've not worked through the problem but the first thing that I'd try is assuming \vec p_1= \vec p_2=0 and E=m_p+m_\pi in the center-of-mass frame (which is not the frame that E' is given/asked!) and see if it gives sensible results.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K