What is the angle between the initial velocity vectors of the two children?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two children colliding on a frictionless surface and subsequently colliding with a man. The objective is to determine the angle between the initial velocity vectors of the two children, given their masses and speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to consider the vector nature of momentum rather than simply adding magnitudes. There are questions about how to approach the problem without knowing the directions of the children's velocities initially.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and guidance regarding the momentum conservation principle and the implications of the final stationary state of the composite system. There is ongoing exploration of how to calculate the individual momentum components and the angles involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the assumption that the two children stick together upon collision, and the discussion includes considerations of the reference frame for analyzing momentum. Participants are also grappling with the implications of the problem's setup and the need for vector analysis.

mike_24
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am having problems with a particular question it says:
Two 30kg children, each with a speed of 4.0m/s, are sliding on a frictionless frozen pond when they collide and stick together because they have Velcro straps on their jackets. The two children then collide and stick to a 75kg man who is sliding at 2.0m/s. After the collision, the three-person composite is stationary. What is the angle between the initial velocity vectors of the two children?
So what i did was you have the mass and velocity of both kids, they are both the same, and i found the total velocity of them using V=m1v1+m2v2/m1+m2.
Then i used the mass and velocity and mass of the man and I used the new velocity I found and the combined mass (doubled the original mass) and this time solved for the angle using Tan(theta)= m2v2/m1v1 and took the inverse of that to find the angle.
I am not sure if that was the correct angle to find or not, or if I even went about this problem the right way, if anyone could help me out it would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance

Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mike_24 said:
So what i did was you have the mass and velocity of both kids, they are both the same, and i found the total velocity of them using V=m1v1+m2v2/m1+m2.
Careful. The kids have the same speed, but they move in different directions. You can't just add their momenta together, you need to add them like vectors.

Here's a hint: Since, after the kids collide with the man, the total momentum is zero, what must be the combined momentum of the kids? Use that to figure out the angle between the kid's initial velocities.
 
But you don't know the direction they are coming from, how would you figure that out?, because you find the angles at the end of the problem, that is what the question wants...
 
You'll find that you don't need to know where they are coming from to find the angle the kids make with each other. Try this: Pretend the man is sliding along in the -x direction. What's his momentum? What must be the total momentum of the kids? (Before they collide.)
 
So when finding the new velocity when the two kids collide, do I find the center of mass velocities in the x and y components and then find the magnitude of that to find their new velocity?, or do I need to use cosine and sine in my equations and find the velocity that way. If i did use cosine and sine I am not really sure how to go about that.
 
mike_24 said:
So when finding the new velocity when the two kids collide, do I find the center of mass velocities in the x and y components and then find the magnitude of that to find their new velocity?, or do I need to use cosine and sine in my equations and find the velocity that way. If i did use cosine and sine I am not really sure how to go about that.

What center of mass do you mean? Isn't it stated that the two kids stick together when they collide? Or am I missing something?
 
No that is right, they do stick together. I just don't really know what to do with this problem and I was just throwing out some ideas I came up with. I am pretty confused at the moment with it though.
 
First things first: Answer the two (hopefully easy) questions that I asked in post #4. I'll repeat them here:

(1) Pretend the man is sliding along in the -x direction. What's his momentum?

(2) Given the above, what must be the momentum of the two kids (together) just before they collide with the man?​

Once you answer these questions, you'll be in a better position to solve the problem.
 
Well
1. The mans momentum would be his mass(velocity)= -150 because he is moving along the negative x axis.
2. The momentum of the 2 kids must have a momentum of 150, which will make them all stop once they collide.
 
  • #10
Right! Now you can get to work on the real problem:

(1) What was the momentum of each kid (magnitude only) before they collided?

(2) Since the total momentum of the two kids together has an x-component of 150, what must be the x-component of the momentum of each kid separately?

(3) What angle from the x-axis must each kid have had to make their x-component equal to that value? (One kid will be above the x-axis, the other below it.) This requires finding the component using a little trig.

(4) Now that you know the angle each kid made with the x-axis, what's the angle between them?
 
  • #11
1. Each kid would have a momentum on 120 each ( 30kg*4m/s)
2. Would each kid have equal momentum?, meaning 75 each?
 
  • #12
mike_24 said:
1. Each kid would have a momentum on 120 each ( 30kg*4m/s)
Right.
2. Would each kid have equal momentum?, meaning 75 each?
Exactly. Each kid would have an x-component of momentum equal to 75 kg-m/s.

Keep going.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K