MHB What Is the Annihilator of a Quotient Ring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sudharaka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    quotient Ring
Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone, :)

I think I need to refresh my memory about annihilators and quotient rings. Hope you can help me with the following example.

I want to find the annihilator of $a'$ and $b'$ of the quotient ring $R=\mathbb{Z}/(a'b')$ where $a',\,b'>1$. So if I go by the definition, $ann(a')=\{r\in \mathbb{R}\mid a'r=0\}=\{a' \mathbb{Z}+b' \mathbb{Z}+(a'\,b')\in \mathbb{R}\mid a'(a' \mathbb{Z}+b'\mathbb{Z})=0\}$Am I correct unto this point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sudharaka said:
Hi everyone, :)

I think I need to refresh my memory about annihilators and quotient rings. Hope you can help me with the following example.

I want to find the annihilator of $a'$ and $b'$ of the quotient ring $R=\mathbb{Z}/(a'b')$ where $a',\,b'>1$. So if I go by the definition, $ann(a')=\{r\in \mathbb{R}\mid a'r=0\}=\{a' \mathbb{Z}+b' \mathbb{Z}+(a'\,b')\in \mathbb{R}\mid a'(a' \mathbb{Z}+b'\mathbb{Z})=0\}$Am I correct unto this point?

Hi everyone, :)

Since I was in a hurry to find the answer to this question I posted this on StackExchange and I got an answer to this there.

>>Link to Thread<<
 
Your first post is rather jumbled, and the notation is weird.

Suppose $R = \Bbb Z/(ab)$. I think by:

$a'$ you must mean $a' = a + (ab) \in \Bbb Z/(ab)$.

If we want to know what:

$\text{ann}(a') = \{k + (ab) \in \Bbb Z/(ab): (k + (ab))(a + (ab)) = 0 + (ab)\}$

is, this is the same thing as asking:

For what $k \in \Bbb Z$ do we have:

$ka \equiv 0\text{ (mod }ab)$?

The first thing to notice about this, is that if gcd(k,ab) = 1, this will never happen.

On the other hand, it is obvious that if $k \equiv tb\text{ (mod }ab)$ it will ALWAYS happen.

Now, if:

$(k + (ab))(a + (ab)) = ka + (ab) = (ab)$

it is necessarily the case that $ka \in (ab)$. This means that:

$ka = tab$ for some integer $t$. The integers are cancellative, so we can deduce from this that:

$k = tb$, which is the same thing as saying $k \in (b)$.

Thus $k' \in \text{ann}(a') \iff k \in (b)$, that is:

$\text{ann}(a') = (b') =$ the ideal generated by $b + (ab)$ in the quotient.

Let's look at a specific example, to see how this actually goes down:

Let $a = 4, b = 6$, and we shall work mod 24. As we saw above, we need not consider the congruence class (cosets) of:

1,5,7,11,13,17,19,23 which only leaves 16 cosets to check.

It is immediate that 0,6,12,18 all annihilate 4 (or rather the coset of 4), so we need only show that:

2,3,4,8,9,10,14,15,16,20,21,22 do NOT annihilate 4. This can be done explicitly:

2*4 = 8
3*4 = 12
8*4 = 8
9*4 = 12
10*4 = 16
14*4 = 8
15*4 = 12
16*4 = 16
20*4 = 8
21*4 = 12
22*4 = 16

so it is indeed the case that 6 generates the annihilator.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top