What is the approximate quantum number of the electron?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the approximate quantum number of an electron confined in a one-dimensional box with infinite potential walls. The problem involves calculating energy based on the electron's speed and the box's dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss calculating the total energy of the electron using different equations, including non-relativistic kinetic energy and the energy levels derived from the Schrödinger Equation. Questions arise regarding the validity of these equations in different contexts, such as relativistic effects.

Discussion Status

Some participants confirm the quantum number n=4 as correct and share their calculations. There is a collaborative effort to clarify the energy calculations and the implications of using different formulas. While some participants express satisfaction with the guidance received, there is no explicit consensus on the methodology used.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using consistent units in calculations and question the applicability of certain equations under relativistic conditions.

jk4
[SOLVED] particle in a box

Homework Statement


An electron moves with a speed of v = [tex]10^{-4}[/tex]c inside a one-dimensional box of length 48.5nm. The potential is infinite elsewhere. What is the approximate quantum number of the electron?

Homework Equations


[tex]E_{n} = \frac{n^{2}\pi^{2}\hbar^{2}}{2mL^{2}}[/tex]
n = 1, 2, 3, . . .

[tex]E = \gamma mc^{2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I was trying to solve it by finding the total energy of the electron, then using the first equation I stated using the total energy as "En". Then I would try and solve for n but I get a very different number. The answer is supposed to be 4.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
n=4 is right. What did you get for the E corresponding v=10^(-4)c? What do you get if you put n=4 into En? BTW v<<c. You could just use (1/2)mv^2 for the energy.
 
Dick said:
n=4 is right. What did you get for the E corresponding v=10^(-4)c? What do you get if you put n=4 into En? BTW v<<c. You could just use (1/2)mv^2 for the energy.

yes. I got 3.969 for using [tex]E_n=\frac{1}{2}mv^2[/tex].
Besides, [tex]E_{n} = \frac{n^{2}\pi^{2}\hbar^{2}}{2mL^{2}}[/tex] is a result from Schrödinger Equation which is non-relativistic. I am not sure if this form preserve in Dirac Equation or not.
 
EDIT:
ok I got it, thanks for the help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Put units on dimensionful numbers ok. I calculate E = (0.5)(9.1095 E -31*kg)(10E-4 x c)^2 and I get 4.09E-22J. We are using the same numbers, unless you are using a different value of c??
 
jk4 said:
EDIT:
ok I got it, thanks for the help.


[tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{n^{2}\pi^{2}\hbar^{2}}{2mL^{2}}[/tex]

then

[tex]n=\frac{mvL}{\pi \hbar}[/tex]

put [tex]m=9\times 10^{-31}, v=3\times 10^{4}, L=48.5\times 10^{-9} \mbox{ and } \hbar = 1.055\times 10^{-34}[/tex]

then you can get [tex]n\approx 4[/tex]

get it?
 
wow - this really helped - thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K