I What is the average annual accumulation of cosmic dust on Earth?

AI Thread Summary
The average annual accumulation of cosmic dust on Earth is approximately 4 x 10^7 kg, translating to about 10^-7 kg/m^2/year when divided by the Earth's surface area. This dust includes materials from meteors and stardust, but excludes gas or liquid forms. The typical density of rock suggests that this accumulation results in a depth of less than 10^-10 m per year. The discussion also briefly touches on the collection of water, although details on that are less emphasized. Overall, the focus remains on the quantification of cosmic dust accumulation.
swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
By "accumulation", I mean depth at the Earth's surface (i.e., whatever volume it is would be divided up the surface area). This dust would be from anything (e.g., meteors, stardust, etc.), but would only count stuff that ends up as dust (i.e., no gas or liquid). I guess a follow-on question would be how much water collects.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Have you tried an internet search?
 
The mass is 4x107kg/year according to this paper (which is linked off the Wikipedia page on cosmic dust, so you should have been able to find easily). The Earth's surface area is something like 5×1014m2, so around 10-7kg/m2/year. Typical density of rock is around 3-5×103kg/m3, for a depth of less than 10-10m/year. On that scale, what fraction is or isn't rock really isn't important.
 
PeroK said:
Have you tried an internet search?
It's swampwiz. So no.

We should be honored to always be his first stop.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PeroK and Motore
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top