What is the best for an experimental particle physicist?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the educational paths for aspiring experimental particle physicists, specifically the choice between pursuing a double degree in physics and computer science versus physics and material engineering. The focus is on how each option may impact future career opportunities in particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in becoming an experimental physicist and seeks advice on the best double degree choice for their career.
  • Another participant suggests that computer science is beneficial for analysis software, while material engineering is more relevant for detector development, noting that both paths can be pursued without a double degree.
  • A third participant reiterates the previous point about the relevance of both fields and mentions a personal preference for material engineering.
  • Another participant advocates for focusing solely on physics and emphasizes the importance of engaging in research groups instead of pursuing a double degree.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Contextual Notes

aveline de grandpre
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
I'm interested to become an experimental physicist particularly in particle physics. I have the chance to pursue a double degree. what is the best choice that will help me more in my future career.- a double degree in physics and computer science or a double degree in physics and material engineering?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
Computer science is more interesting for analysis software, material engineering is more interesting for detector development. Both is interesting, but both can be done without double degree as well.
Typically physicists do both at some point, but they can have a focus on one aspect. What do you prefer?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
mfb said:
Computer science is more interesting for analysis software, material engineering is more interesting for detector development. Both is interesting, but both can be done without double degree as well.
Typically physicists do both at some point, but they can have a focus on one aspect. What do you prefer?

I think Material Engineering will be my choice
 
Physics. Just physics. Extra time should be spent finding and working in a research group.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K