What is the Charge Density in the Region 0<z<1 Using Gauss's Law?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the charge density in the region 01.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Gauss's Law to a cuboidal volume to derive the charge density. Some participants question the correctness of the approach and the implications for regions outside the specified range.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided feedback on the original poster's reasoning, with some affirming the correctness of the approach and others suggesting further clarification on the nature of charge density at specific points.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is constrained by homework rules that prohibit the use of the differential form of Gauss's Law. There is also an ongoing exploration of the implications of the electric field behavior in different regions.

Jahnavi
Messages
848
Reaction score
102

Homework Statement


charge.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



In the region |z|<1 ,

E(z) = -dV/dz = 10zk

This means there is a variable electric field in the region -1<z<1 .In the +z region it is directed in the +z direction and vica versa .

For finding the charge density in the region 0<z<1, I need to apply Gauss's law . I am not supposed to use differential form of Gauss law .

Consider at a distance z from the origin a thin cuboid of side a×a and height ∆z .

The two square faces are at distances z1 and z2 , z2>z1

Flux through the closed cuboidal box would have a contribution from only these two square surfaces which are perpendicular to the electric field .

Net flux = E(at z2)a2 - E(at z1)a2 = 10a2z2-10a2z1

Applying Gauss law ∫E⋅ds= ρa2∆z/ε

10a2z2-10a2z1 = ρa2∆z/ε

10a2∆z = ρa2∆z/ε

ρ = 10ε in the region 0<z<1

Is that right ?

Please help me with this problem .
 

Attachments

  • charge.png
    charge.png
    35.5 KB · Views: 731
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work looks correct to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
Thank you very much .

Sorry , I had constantly been editing my work till I saw your reply (after posting the thread ) to make things clearer. I hope I haven't changed anything which you found correct and which is wrong now .

The electric field is directed in the +z direction for 0<z<1 .

For z>1 , there is a constant electric field in the +z direction .

Here I need to prove that there is no charge anywhere in z>1 .

For this I can again consider a cubical shaped box of dimensions a×a×a , such that there will be two square surfaces perpendicular to the electric field .

Since the electric field is constant the net flux through the closed cubical surface would be zero .

Applying Gauss law the net charge enclosed would be zero .

This means there would be no charge anywhere in the region z>1 .

Is that sufficient reasoning ?

Would 1) be the correct option ?
 
That looks good. Strictly speaking, I think your arguments yield the average charge density, ρavg, in the rectangular boxes you used. But it should be easy to go on to argue how to get the charge density, ρ, at any point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
TSny said:
But it should be easy to go on to argue how to get the charge density, ρ, at any point.

If we consider a cubical box of dimensions of infinitesimal length dx , dy , dz , do we get charge density at a point .Is this what you are indicating at ?
 
Jahnavi said:
If we consider a cubical box of dimensions of infinitesimal length dx , dy , dz , do we get charge density at a point .Is this what you are indicating at ?
Yes. Good work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
Thanks !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K