What is the charge of the oil drop in Millikan's experiment?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the charge of an oil drop in Millikan's experiment. The oil drop's radius was determined to be 2.19 x 10-6 m and its mass calculated as 4.04 x 10-14 kg. The electric charge of the oil drop was found to be -1.31 x 10-18 C, which is inconsistent with the known charge of an electron (1.602 x 10-19 C). Participants clarified that Millikan's experiment aimed to find the absolute charge of the electron by measuring multiple oil drops and determining their charge-to-mass ratio.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as force, mass, and charge.
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion and fluid dynamics, specifically Stokes' law.
  • Knowledge of electric fields and forces, particularly the relationship between electric force and charge.
  • Basic understanding of Millikan's oil drop experiment and its historical significance in determining the charge of the electron.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Stokes' law in fluid dynamics.
  • Learn about the methodology of Millikan's oil drop experiment and its implications in physics.
  • Explore the concept of charge quantization and how it relates to the electron's charge.
  • Investigate the historical context of early 20th-century physics experiments that contributed to atomic theory.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electromagnetism, and anyone interested in the historical experiments that shaped our understanding of atomic structure and charge.

Daniel Luo
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When an oil drop falls freely, the velocity first increases, but afterwards it quickly reaches a constant speed, since the air resistance becomes equal to the weight of the oil drop. The air resistance is given by:

Fair=6\pir\etav,

where \eta is the viscosity of air with a value of 1.759*10-5 N s/m2, Oil's density is 918.7 kg/m3. In Millikan's experiment, the speed of the oil drop is 5.449*10-4 m/s.

- Find the radius and mass of the oil drop.

Afterwards, electricity was sent through the plates, and the speed of the oil drop increases by 5.746*10-4 m/s. The upward electric force acting on the oil drop is given by:

FE=qE,

where E is the electric field strength: E = 3.178*105 N/C.

Find the electric charge of the oil drop, q.

Homework Equations



For no. 1:

Weight = Air resistance
mg = Fair=6\pir\etav,
\rhoVg=Fair=6\pir\etav,

No. 2:

FE=qE
mg = FE + Fair

The Attempt at a Solution



All right. What I did in no. 1 was to say that the weight was equal to the air resistance. Assuming the drop to be spherical, I said:

\rho(4/3\pir3)g = 6\pir\etav. Then I solved for r:

r = 2.19*10-6 m

And I found m:

m = \rho(4/3\pir3) = 4.04*10-14 kg (This seems to be too light even for a raindrop?)


For no. 2: I said that the weight was equal to the sum of air resistance and the electric force:

mg = 6\pir\etav + qE

Solving for q gave: q = -1.31*10-18 C.

However, this answer seems wrong, as Millikan tried to find the charge of the electron e from this experiment, which is 1.602*10-19 C.

Have I done something wrong? In case I did, what was my mistake?

Thanks a lot!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well a raindrop is water and may have a radius around 1-2mm.
The oil drop has a radius of around 3 microns ... about 1000x smaller.
Millican needed a microscope to see them.

Technically, Millican found the electron charge-to-mass ratio from this experiment.
To find out how much charge a single electron has, he needed to know how many electrons were responsible for the charge.

How many excess electrons are there in your oil drop?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Technically, Millican found the electron charge-to-mass ratio from this experiment.
No, I think that was obtained through a much earlier experiment by someone else. The point of Millikan's experiment was to find the absolute charge. (The mass of the electrons would have been immaterial in the oil drop.). The technique was to measure the charge on many oil drops and find the GCD.
 
How do I find out? Do I use the mass, molar mass and Avogadro's number?
 
Daniel Luo said:
How do I find out? Do I use the mass, molar mass and Avogadro's number?
You have found the charge, what's the problem? If you like, you can estimate the number of excess electrons in the drop.
 
It just doesn't seem right? I get the no. of electron in the drop to be 8 (rounded).
 
Am I not supposed to find the actual electric charge of an electron? Isn't that he point of the experiment?
 
haruspex said:
No, I think that was obtained through a much earlier experiment by someone else.
Oh you are right - that was J. J. Thomson who did the q/m thingy.
I keep getting them mixed up.

You still can't do it with just one drop.

Daniel Luo said:
It just doesn't seem right? I get the no. of electron in the drop to be 8 (rounded).
1. you were not asked to find the charge of an electron.
2. I doubt you found the total number of electrons in the oil drop ... recall: neutral oil has electrons (-) and atomic nuclei (+) in equal amounts. Since your oil drop is negatively charged ...
 
So I should just go ahead with my answer which corresponds to approx. the charge of 8 electrons?
 
  • #10
According to what you wrote in post #1, you have only been asked to determine the radius, mass, and charge, for the whole drop. That's all. Nothing about determining anything for the electron nor anything about finding out how many electrons there are on the drop.

In order to discover the charge of an electron by Millican's method, you need to repeat the experiment for a great many different oil drops.
http://webphysics.davidson.edu/appl...ts/pqp_errata/cd_errata_fixes/section4_5.html
 
  • #11
Daniel Luo said:
So I should just go ahead with my answer which corresponds to approx. the charge of 8 electrons?

That is quite a good result, the charge is not much more than 8 electrons. Usually, the oil drop gains more than one electrons in that experiment. Anyway, when I did it as a student during Laboratory Practice, I got usually half-integer results :biggrin:

ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K