What is the Closure of a Proper Ideal in a Unital Banach Algebra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fredrik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    closure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The closure of a proper ideal in a unital Banach algebra is definitively a proper ideal. This conclusion is supported by the established result that if an ideal I in a unital normed algebra A is non-zero, then I does not contain the identity element 1, which is crucial for proving that the closure cannot equal A. The proof involves demonstrating that the closure is closed under linear combinations and that if an element is in the closure, it cannot converge to 1, thereby ensuring the closure remains a proper ideal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of unital Banach algebras
  • Familiarity with the concept of ideals in algebra
  • Knowledge of convergence in normed spaces
  • Proficiency in linear algebra and functional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of unital Banach algebras
  • Learn about the structure of ideals in normed algebras
  • Explore the concept of closure in topological spaces
  • Investigate the implications of invertible elements in algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in functional analysis, algebraists, and students studying advanced algebraic structures will benefit from this discussion.

Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
10,876
Reaction score
423

Homework Statement



Prove that the closure of a proper ideal in a unital Banach algebra is a proper ideal.

Homework Equations



The hint is to use the result of the previous exercise: If I is an ideal in a unital normed algebra A, and I≠{0}, we have

I=A \Leftrightarrow I contains 1 \Leftrightarrow I contains an invertible element

The Attempt at a Solution



x is in the closure of I if and only if there's a sequence (xn) in I such that xn→x.

It's easy to show that the closure of I is closed under linear combinations:

\|(ax_n+by_n)-(ax+by)\|\leq |a|\|x_n-x\|+|b|\|y_n-y\|<\varepsilon

(I don't feel like typing every word of the argument. I'm assuming that it's obvious what I have in mind.).

It's also easy to show that if i is in the closure of I and x is in A, xi is in the closure of I:

\|xi_n-xi\|\leq \|x\|\|i_n-i\|<\varepsilon

These results imply that the closure is an ideal. What I don't see is how to prove that it's a proper ideal, i.e. that it's neither {0} nor A. The most straightforward approach seems to try to prove that 1 can't be a member, but I don't see how to do that. I'm probably missing something really obvious as usual.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Recall that the invertible elements of A form an open subset of A.
 
Thank you. That was all I needed to hear. That means that there's an open ball around 1 that's a subset of Ic, and that means that no sequence in I can have 1 as a limit. So 1 can't be a member of the closure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
17K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K