MHB What is the connection between roots of f and g using Rolle's Theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tomp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
Using Rolle's Theorem, it can be shown that between any two roots of the function f(x) = 1 - e^(x)*sin(x), there exists at least one root of the function g(x) = 1 + e^(x)*cos(x). When two successive roots of f are considered, there exists a point c in the interval (a, b) where the derivative f'(c) equals zero, indicating a turning point. At this turning point, the equations derived show that f(c) equals g(c), confirming that they intersect. Consequently, g must have at least one root between the two successive roots of f. This establishes a direct connection between the roots of f and g as dictated by Rolle's Theorem.
Tomp
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
[h=1][/h]I'm doing a question and I am getting stuck and need help

Question:
Consider the continuous functions f(x) = 1 - e^(x)*sin(x) and g(x) = 1 + e^(x)*cos(x). Using Rolle's Theorem, prove that between any two roots of f there exists at least one root of g.

Hint
Remember that, a root of f is a point x in the domain of f such that f(x) = 0.

Can someone provide a natural language proof of this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let a and b be two successive roots of f. Observe that by Rolle's theorem, we must have some c in (a,b) such that f'(c)=0. This means we must have:

$\displaystyle -e^c\cos(c)-e^c\sin(c)=0$

$\displaystyle -e^c\sin(c)=e^c\cos(c)$

$\displaystyle 1-e^c\sin(c)=1+e^c\cos(c)$

$\displaystyle f(c)=g(c)$

So, we find that f and g meet at the turning points of f. This means g must have at least one root between two successive turning points of f.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K