What is the Conservation of Angular Momentum for Motion Confined to a Cone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MisterX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cone Motion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of angular momentum in a system where motion is constrained to a conical surface. Participants are analyzing the equations of motion derived from the Lagrangian formalism and exploring the implications of angular momentum conservation in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of the Lagrangian and its relation to angular momentum, particularly focusing on how to express certain variables in terms of angular momentum while eliminating others. There is also a consideration of the implications of specific terms in the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications on the mathematical expressions. Some participants are attempting to simplify their equations, while others are confirming the correctness of derived expressions. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive dialogue is evident.

Contextual Notes

One participant mentions being unwell, which may affect their contributions. The discussion includes attempts to manipulate equations involving angular momentum and gravitational effects, indicating a complex interplay of variables.

MisterX
Messages
758
Reaction score
71

Homework Statement



yDI8qJI.png


Homework Equations


[itex]\frac{\partial\mathcal{L} }{\partial \phi} = \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}}[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]z = r\cos\alpha[/itex]
[itex]s = r\sin\alpha[/itex]

[itex]v^2 = \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\phi}^2 sin^2\alpha[/itex]

[itex]\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2 + \frac{1}{2}mr^2 \dot{\phi}^2 sin^2\alpha- mgr\cos\alpha[/itex]

[itex]\ell_z = I_z\omega_z = ms^2\dot{\phi}[/itex]
[itex]\ell_z = mr^2\dot{\phi}\sin^2\alpha[/itex]

The [itex]\phi[/itex] Euler Lagrange equation is just conservation of angular momentum.
[itex]\frac{\partial\mathcal{L} }{\partial \phi} = 0 = \frac{d}{dt}\left(mr^2\dot{\phi}sin^2\alpha \right) = \dot{\ell_z} = \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}}[/itex]

[itex]\dot{\ell_z} = m\sin^2(\alpha)(2r\dot{r}\dot{\phi} + mr^2\ddot{\phi}) = 0[/itex]

the [itex]r[/itex] Euler Lagrange equation
[itex]\frac{\partial\mathcal{L} }{\partial r} = mr\dot{\phi}^2\sin^2\alpha - mgcos\alpha = m\ddot{r} = \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{r}}[/itex]

I'm not sure how to put this in terms of [itex]\ell_z[/itex] in a way that gets rid of all the [itex]\dot{\phi}[/itex] and [itex]r[/itex]. There's that extra power of [itex]\dot{\phi}[/itex].
 

Attachments

  • TaylorProb7-38.png
    TaylorProb7-38.png
    34.2 KB · Views: 504
Physics news on Phys.org
MisterX said:
I'm not sure how to put this in terms of [itex]\ell_z[/itex] in a way that gets rid of all the [itex]\dot{\phi}[/itex] and [itex]r[/itex]. There's that extra power of [itex]\dot{\phi}[/itex].

You just want to eliminate [itex]\dot{\phi}[/itex], not both [itex]\dot{\phi}[/itex] and [itex]r[/itex].
 
Oops, I should have read that better. Thanks for answering both my questions this week, TSny!

I got as far as

[itex]\ddot{\epsilon} \approx \frac{\ell_z^2}{m^2 r_0^3 sin^2\alpha \cos\alpha}(1 - \frac{3\epsilon}{r_0}) - gcos\alpha[/itex] ?


But I think I'm going to leave this incomplete. It's late and I'm recovering from a cold.
 
Last edited:
MisterX said:
I got as far as

[itex]\ddot{\epsilon} \approx \frac{\ell_z^2}{m^2 r_0^3 sin^2\alpha \cos\alpha}(1 - \frac{3\epsilon}{r_0}) - gcos\alpha[/itex] ?

But I think I'm going to leave this incomplete. It's late and I'm recovering from a cold.

Hey, that looks good. Can you argue that ## \frac{\ell_z^2}{m^2 r_0^3 sin^2\alpha \cos\alpha}## cancels ## - gcos\alpha## leaving a single term on the right proportional to ##\epsilon##?

Take care
 
Yes, here is what I got.

[itex]\ddot{\epsilon} = -\frac{3gcos(\alpha)}{r_0}\epsilon[/itex]
 
I think that's right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K