What Is the Constant of Proportionality in the Equation Q = K1 M?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of the constant of proportionality in the equation Q = K1 M, where Q represents net charge and M represents molecular weight. The constant K1 signifies that charge is directly proportional to molecular weight, meaning if M increases, Q increases linearly. The conversation also touches on related concepts such as linear relationships and inversely proportional relationships, providing examples like Newton's law of gravitation, where the constant of proportionality is denoted as G. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping fundamental principles in physics and mathematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic equations
  • Familiarity with the concept of proportionality
  • Knowledge of linear relationships in mathematics
  • Basic understanding of physical laws, such as Newton's laws
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of direct and inverse proportionality in mathematical functions
  • Learn about the significance of constants of proportionality in physics
  • Explore Newton's law of gravitation and its mathematical formulation
  • Investigate real-world applications of proportional relationships in science
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics and physics, educators teaching proportional relationships, and anyone interested in understanding fundamental scientific principles related to charge and mass.

dranseth
Messages
87
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can anyone translate what k would be? I have never had to deal with a constant of proportionality before, and am not quite sure how to deal with it..

The resulting aggregates therefore
each have a net charge Q that is directly proportional to their molecular weight M:
Q= K1 M
where K1 (and in subsequent steps of this derivation K ) is a constant of proportionality.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've dealt with them, you just didn't know what they were called

When I say y is directly proportional to x, what I mean is that if I double x, I double y. If I halve x, I halve y. If I square root x, I square root y, etc.

so y=x? No, I said if I double x it doubles y, but I didn't say they're the SAME number! So if y and x are proportional you'd say y=k*x (or whatever letter) so all those things I said are true, if you double x, for that equation to still be equal you must double y

For a counterexample what if they AREN'T directly proportional? So say y=k*x^2, if I double x, for the equation to hold, I have to quadruple y!

You'll note that y=k*x results in the graph of a line with slope k, so you'll also hear that y and x are linearly related, which means the same thing as directly proportional

You'll also commonly hear "inversely proportional", which means y=k/x, so if I double x, I take half of y, if I triple x, a third of y

Counterexample again when it's NOT inversely proportional, y=k/x^2, if I double x, I take a fourth of y!

ADDENDUM: The constant of proportionality that you're likely most familiar with is probably pi!

What is pi exactly?(3! Wait no...) A bajillion years ago(1 jigga year)some ancient Greeks or Carthaginians or whoever were looking at circles and thinking "hey the circumference and diameter are directly proportional!" Meaning if you took a circle with diameter of 1 m(well ancient greeks so like...1 hand?), it would have some circumference. If you took a circle with diameter 2(same unit), well the circumference is twice as much as before!

So C=k*d they figured. So what was k? They had to take an actual circle that they could measure the circumference and diameter of, and find the ratio(so if C=k*d, then k=C/d) and they found it was a little more than 3. About .14 more than 3. And they called it pi since they were Greeks and the latin letter k probably didn't exist then >_>

That's how Newton figured out his law of gravitation. He figured that the net force(which he had already figured out was directly proportional to acceleration, with that particular constant of proportionality being the mass)was directly proportional to the product of the two masses involved, and inversely proportional to the distance squared(so if you double either mass, you double the force, but if you double the distance between them you cut the force by a FOURTH)

And that's the meat of the law, the part that really matters. The constant of proportionality (G, so F=G*m1*m2/d^2) is just some fundamental constant which he didn't have the tools to measure at the time

So for the equation in your question, if you're not given K1, you're not really expected to care then. The POINT is that charge is directly proportional to M, so you understand the relationship between the two. As the molar mass of the aggregates increases, Q increases, and the nature of their relationship is linear
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K