What is the contradiction in integrating around a contour with a branch cut?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration of the complex logarithm function, specifically ln(z), around a contour that circumvents a branch cut along the positive x-axis. The integration process involves a keyhole contour that avoids crossing the branch cut, leading to the observation that the argument theta transitions from 0 to 2π. This creates a contradiction since theta is restricted to the range 0 ≤ theta < 2π. The resolution lies in understanding that the contour is compact and approaches the real axis without crossing it, allowing for a consistent evaluation of the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis, particularly branch cuts and multi-valued functions.
  • Familiarity with contour integration techniques and their applications.
  • Knowledge of the logarithm function in the complex plane, specifically ln(z).
  • Ability to interpret and utilize keyhole contours in integration.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of branch cuts in complex functions, focusing on ln(z).
  • Learn about keyhole contours and their applications in complex integration.
  • Explore the concept of residues in complex analysis and their role in evaluating integrals.
  • Investigate the implications of multi-valued functions in complex analysis and how they affect integration.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques and the behavior of multi-valued functions in the complex plane.

sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
In complex analysis we say that for fn's like lnz we apply a branch cut along positive x-axis to make sure it's single valued. i.e restrict theta s.t 0<=theta<2Pi but we never allow theta to equal 2Pi as this would make lnz take on 2nd value.
Let us integrate around a contour which goes from origin to x= infinity, then goes anticlockwise around a circle of infinite radius back to the positive x-axis at plus infinity, then we go back to the origin along the x-axis, and then go clockwise around a circle of zero radius, hence avoiding crossing the branch cut. we say that theta = 0 as we go from the origin out to x=infinity, and then we have to say (in order to get the answer right) that theta = 2pi when we go from x-infinity back to the origin. But surely this is a contradiction, since we assumed that theta could not equal 2 Pi?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sachi said:
In complex analysis we say that for fn's like lnz we apply a branch cut along positive x-axis to make sure it's single valued. i.e restrict theta s.t 0<=theta<2Pi but we never allow theta to equal 2Pi as this would make lnz take on 2nd value.
Let us integrate around a contour which goes from origin to x= infinity, then goes anticlockwise around a circle of infinite radius back to the positive x-axis at plus infinity, then we go back to the origin along the x-axis, and then go clockwise around a circle of zero radius, hence avoiding crossing the branch cut. we say that theta = 0 as we go from the origin out to x=infinity, and then we have to say (in order to get the answer right) that theta = 2pi when we go from x-infinity back to the origin. But surely this is a contradiction, since we assumed that theta could not equal 2 Pi?

Can you better describe this contour?

Try not to lump everything you say in one sentence or even paragraph.
 
You are never integrating over circles with "infinite" or "zero" radius. Your contours are compact and avoid the origin.

You can use a "keyhole" contour to avoid the real axis and clear up your concerns (see diagram near the bottom of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residue_calculus ). The horizontal segments lie strictly above and below the positive real axis, and get closer and closer to it as your contour grows. As this segment below the real axis is approaching it, the argument of log is going to 2*Pi and the integral over this segment will approach the integral over the real axis of this different choice of branch cut.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K