What Is the Core of a Section in Eccentric Loading?

AI Thread Summary
The core of a section in eccentric loading refers to the area where applied loads result in only tensile or compressive stress, crucial for understanding unsymmetrical bending. This concept is often linked to the neutral axis in asymmetric loading scenarios. The term "kernel" or "kern" describes the specific region where a compressive point load can be applied without inducing tensile stress. While resources like Hibbeler's and Beer's books on mechanics of materials may not cover this topic extensively, further research on the "Core or Kernel of a section" may yield additional insights. Understanding this advanced topic is essential for analyzing complex loading conditions in structural engineering.
morpheus343
Messages
29
Reaction score
4
Anyone know of any book on mechanics of materials that covers finding the core of a section in eccentric loading. I am not sure what the term is in english but the direct translation is core of the cross section, it is the region in which if a load is applied, there will be only tensile or only compressive stress. I have looked at Hibbeler's book and Beer's (Mechanics of Materials) and haven't found anything like it. I have encountered this question in unsymmetrical bending due to eccentric loading in an unsymmetrical cross section. Maybe it is on another subject and not mechanics of materials?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
morpheus343 said:
I have encountered this question in unsymmetrical bending due to eccentric loading in an unsymmetrical cross section. Maybe it is on another subject and not mechanics of materials?
It is an advanced topic in the mechanics of materials.

The core of a section is a neutral axis, in the case when the section is subjected to asymmetric loading.

The kernel or kern of a section is the region in which a compressive point load may be applied without producing any tensile stress on the cross-section.

Google 'Core or Kernel of a section'
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top