What is the correct function f(x) to use for this limit?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit problem presented involves evaluating the expression lim (9-3√x)/(9-x) as x approaches 9. Direct substitution results in an indeterminate form of 0/0. The correct approach involves identifying a function f(x) that satisfies the equation (9-3√x)f(x) = 9-x, which is essential for simplifying the limit correctly. The suggested method of multiplying by (-9+3√x) is not valid for this purpose.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with indeterminate forms
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Basic concepts of functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of L'Hôpital's Rule for resolving indeterminate forms
  • Learn about algebraic simplification techniques in limits
  • Explore the properties of square root functions in calculus
  • Investigate the method of rationalizing expressions in limit problems
USEFUL FOR

Students new to calculus, educators teaching limit concepts, and anyone looking to improve their understanding of evaluating limits involving indeterminate forms.

subasurf
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm really new to calculus and limits and have been trying to have a good crack at the following question. Sorry if I haven't written the problem out in the most acceptable format.

lim (9-3√x)/(9-x)
x→9

Substituting 9 gives you 0/0 and indeterminate.

I tried multiplying the numerator and denominator by (-9+3√x), and multiplied out the brackets to wind up with -81/-27 and then simplified down to - 3/1

I'm just not sure if I'm going about this the correct way. I don't necessarily want the answer, just a bit of guidance. Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
subasurf said:
I tried multiplying the numerator and denominator by (-9+3√x), and multiplied out the brackets to wind up with -81/-27 and then simplified down to - 3/1

There is some function f(x) that you can multiply numerator and denominator with, with the property that (9-3√x)f(x) = 9-x, but the function you are suggesting above is not it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K