1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

What is the Coulomb gauge

  1. Jul 24, 2014 #1

    A particular choice of "gauge fields" in which the vector potential has no divergence.


    \nabla\cdot\vec A=0

    Extended explanation

    As explained elsewhere, one introduces "gauge fields" in order to identically solve two of the four Maxwell equations.

    When written in terms of the gauge fields the remaining Maxwell equations (in Gaussian units) are given by:
    \nabla\cdot\left(-\nabla\phi-\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \vec A}{\partial t}\right)
    =4\pi\rho\;,\qquad (1)
    where [itex]\rho[/itex] is the charge density; and
    \nabla\times\nabla\times\vec A
    4\pi\frac{\vec j}{c}
    +\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(-\nabla \phi-\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \vec A}{\partial t}\right)\;,\qquad (2)
    where [itex]\vec j[/itex] is the (charge) current density.

    In the Coulomb gauge, equation (1) reduces to
    -\nabla^2\phi=4\pi\rho\;,\qquad (3)
    which is the same as the usual electrostatic equation for the scalar potential. Thus, in this gauge, charges
    apparently interact through an instantaneous Coulomb potential just like in electrostatics. Of course, the instantaneous nature of the interaction is cancelled by the interaction of the currents via the vector potential and there is no violation of causality.

    The Coulomb gauge is very useful in condensed matter theory where the charges are non-relativistic for the most part and the main contribution to their interaction is most conveniently described as via an instantaneous Coulomb potential.

    The downside to the Coulomb gauge is that equation (2) become rather cumbersome:
    -\nabla^2\vec A
    4\pi\frac{\vec j}{c}
    \frac{\partial}{\partial t}
    \nabla\phi+\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \vec A}{\partial t}
    \right)\;,\qquad (4)
    where [itex]\phi[/itex] is now consider to be known as a functional of [itex]\rho[/itex] via the solution of equation (3).

    From equation (4) we also see that in the non-relativistic limit we can ignore the vector potential. This is
    typically the case for condensed matter systems as mentioned above.

    * This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
  2. jcsd
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted