Jenab2
- 85
- 22
Calculating an interception orbit isn't simple. Try it sometime.EU2AA said:Big difference there.
By measuring the parameters of the orbit, it is possible to calculate the parameters of the future and launch a probe for a meeting.
Repeating these calculations we will obtain more accurate calculations and more accurately guide the probe.
It is quite obvious algorithm.
The reason it isn't simple is that the solution does not occur in closed form. The solution requires a match in the transit times of two different objects, in two different orbits, with both objects reaching the same position in space at the same time. One of the objects is the thing you're trying to intercept. The other object is the spaceship you are using to intercept that thing with.
In general, the spaceship and the object to be intercepted will require different amounts of time to reach any given point on the path of the object to be intercepted. The job of the celestial mechanic is to find one of those exceptional combinations of departure instant and arrival position for which the two objects' transit times are equal.
Furthermore, when the object to be intercepted is an alien space probe, inbound on one leg of a hyperbolic trajectory and then outbound on the other, undertaking to intercept it is going to require a lot of change-of-velocity by our spaceship. If it can be done at all, it won't be cheap. Or quick, either, since the spaceship's speed along its own outbound hyperbolic path will close on the alien space probe by only the difference in their hyperbolic excess speeds.
It might be more productive to try to find out where the alien space probe came from, by back-tracking its inbound trajectory and by reversing (in simulation) the motions of all nearby stars. If we were lucky enough to identify the likely origin star system, we could point a high-gain radio at it and beam some nifty Star Trek theme music at the aliens.
Last edited: