Aufbauwerk 2045 said:
I'm basically off social media but I wanted to check in just to see what the brilliant people on PF have to say these days about the doomsday clock.
Yes, thanks for asking. I am one of the brilliant people of PF and I will respond to your comment.
Please refer to my post #3 in this thread. Coincidentally, I actually had a discussion on the subject with my lab group on this subject this morning, seeing all the news hype around the North Korea thing.
http://thebulletin.org/clock/2017
This morning I recounted to the group a moment in time, probably circa 2004 or so when I was running a business in Seattle and playing fast and loose with the law in order to maximize our profits. We weren't technically doing anything illegal (as far as I knew), but we really weren't doing much research into whether it
was legal, if you know what I mean
So, there was this one point where I had a serious talk with a business colleague who was older and wiser than me that warned me, and these were his exact words, "Just because something bad hasn't happened
yet, doesn't mean that something bad is not going to happen." That kind of hit me, impactly, at the time, and has stayed with me.
Meaning, don't get too comfy with precedent. Nukes are a two-edged sword. Their existence has probably saved hundreds of thousands if not millions of lives over the last 70 years in their deterrent of other worldwide conflicts, but the proliferation of "nuclear states" is daunting.
I love science fiction, but whenever I hear people talk of "where will we be in the 22nd century or the third millennium, or even 2050, all I can think about is this is wishful thinking, there's no way we as a (human) species are going to make it to 2100. This is perhaps one of the main reasons I do what I do. I love our species and don't want to see it go extinct. The best hope for that is to create machines in our own image and send them off through the galaxy.