What is the Darwin Term's Role in Hydrogen's Fine Structure?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Darwin Term plays a crucial role in the fine structure of hydrogen, represented by the perturbation expression V_D = [p_i,[p_i, e^2/r]]. This expression simplifies to V_D = 4πδ(r) when projecting the momentum operator onto real space. The discussion highlights the importance of using the operator identity [p_x, f(x)] = -iħ df(x)/dx to simplify calculations. Participants emphasize the need to carefully handle commutators and apply the product rule when working with wave functions in spherical coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of operator algebra
  • Familiarity with perturbation theory
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Darwin Term in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of the operator identity [p_x, f(x)] = -iħ df(x)/dx
  • Explore perturbation theory techniques in quantum systems
  • Investigate the role of delta functions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on atomic structure and perturbation theory, will benefit from this discussion.

dipole
Messages
553
Reaction score
149
I'm trying to do a HW involving the Darwin Term in the fine structure of hydrogen. I'm given that the perturbation from the Darwin term is equal to (times a constant factor which I'll ignore),

V_D = [p_i,[p_i, \frac{e^2}{r}]] = <br /> e^2\vec{p}^2\frac{1}{r} -2e^2\vec{p}\frac{1}{r}\vec{p} + <br /> e^2\frac{1}{r}\vec{p}^2

I know that the alterntive form of the Darwin term is,

V_D = 4\pi\delta(r)

This comes from the first term in the first expression when you project the momentum operater onto real space, but there are two other terms which I can't seem to get to cancel... can anyone explain how these terms cancel? If they don't, then I have to do an intergal involving the laplacian of the wave function, and an integral involving the first derivite wrt to r of a wave function, for aribitrary n,l,m... and that is going to be a nightmare!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you've left out some terms. When simplifying operator expressions like this, I find it helpful to let the expressions act on an arbitrary function ##\psi##. So

V_D \psi = [p_i,[p_i, \frac{e^2}{r}]] \psi

When expanding the commutators and then simplifying; make sure that you let the p operators act on everything to their right using the product rule.

EDIT: You can also just use the well-known operator identity: ##[p_x, f(x)] = -i\hbar \frac{df(x)}{dx}##
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
I think you've left out some terms. When simplifying operator expressions like this, I find it helpful to let the expressions act on an arbitrary function ##\psi##. So

V_D \psi = [p_i,[p_i, \frac{e^2}{r}]] \psi

When expanding the commutators and then simplifying; make sure that you let the p operators act on everything to their right using the product rule.

EDIT: You can also just use the well-known operator identity: ##[p_x, f(x)] = -i\hbar \frac{df(x)}{dx}##

Doh! I totally forgot about that identity! Yes I do think maybe when I operate on some wave function i should get extra terms, but it's still messy to me, since I'm trying to do everything in spherical coordinates. :(

I'll use the identity to finish the problem, then go back and try to work out how things should cancel. Thanks a bunch!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K