What is the definition of proper time interval according to Wikipedia?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and interpretation of proper time intervals as described in a Wikipedia article. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of proper time, the nature of worldlines in different reference frames, and the implications of these concepts in the context of special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that the proper time interval is defined through an integral involving the worldline of a clock, which can be evaluated in different frames.
  • There is a discussion about whether the worldline is a line on the time axis of the rest frame of the clock, with some arguing it is not strictly the time axis but rather a line parallel to it.
  • Participants note that the formula for proper time is general and applies to any timelike worldline, regardless of the state of motion of the clock.
  • Some contributions emphasize that the proper time is invariant and can be calculated without needing to construct local rest frames.
  • There is a mention of the mathematical expression for the proper time and its dependence on the worldline's velocity in various coordinates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the proper time is invariant and can be calculated for any timelike worldline. However, there is disagreement regarding the characterization of the worldline in relation to the time axis, with multiple interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Some statements depend on the definitions of terms like "timelike line" and "worldline," and there are unresolved nuances regarding the conditions under which the proper time is evaluated.

Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Wikipedia article on proper time

"Given this differential expression for ##\tau##, the proper time interval is defined as
##
\Delta \tau=\int_P d \tau=\int \frac{d s}{c} .
##
Here ##P## is the worldline from some initial event to some final event with the ordering of the events fixed by the requirement that the final event occurs later according to the clock than the initial event."

In the integral
##
\Delta \tau=\int_P d \tau=\int \frac{d s}{c} ## , is the worldline a line on the time axis of the frame in which the clock is at rest? Also I can calculate the integral in another frame in which the clock is moving, however the world line will have spacetime coordinates different than the rest frame ,however due to invariance of ##ds## we get the same value of proper time as we have in the rest frame. Am I correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kashmir said:
is the worldline a line on the time axis of the frame in which the clock is at rest?
No, it's any timelike line. In general you would write $$\begin{eqnarray*}
ds&=&\sqrt{c^2dt^2-dx^2}\\
&=&\sqrt{c^2-\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2}dt
&=&\sqrt{c^2-v^2(t)}dt
\end{eqnarray*}$$where ##v(t)## is the velocity of the worldline in whatever coordinates you're using.
Kashmir said:
Also I can calculate the integral in another frame in which the clock is moving, however the world line will have spacetime coordinates different than the rest frame ,however due to invariance of we get the same value of proper time as we have in the rest frame.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale, vanhees71 and topsquark
Ibix said:
No, it's any timelike line. In general you would write $$\begin{eqnarray*}
ds&=&\sqrt{c^2dt^2-dx^2}\\
&=&\sqrt{c^2-\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2}dt
&=&\sqrt{c^2-v^2(t)}dt
\end{eqnarray*}$$where ##v(t)## is the velocity of the worldline in whatever coordinates you're using.
It is not any timelike line in the rest frame, but it is also not necessarily the time axis. It is a line parallel to the time axis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Kashmir said:
is the worldline a line on the time axis of the frame in which the clock is at rest?
##P## is the worldline of any clock in any state of motion in any reference frame in any spacetime.

Kashmir said:
Also I can calculate the integral in another frame in which the clock is moving, however the world line will have spacetime coordinates different than the rest frame ,however due to invariance of ds we get the same value of proper time as we have in the rest frame.
Yes. You can change the reference frame as you like, including non-inertial frames, the value will not change.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and vanhees71
Orodruin said:
It is not any timelike line in the rest frame, but it is also not necessarily the time axis. It is a line parallel to the time axis.
The formula above is not required to be evaluated in the clock’s rest frame
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and vanhees71
Dale said:
The formula above is not required to be evaluated in the clock’s rest frame
No, but it is what the OP asked about:
Kashmir said:
is the worldline a line on the time axis of the frame in which the clock is at rest?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and vanhees71
Orodruin said:
It is not any timelike line in the rest frame
Ah yes, sorry. @Kashmir - the formula you quoted is completely general and works for any ##P##, whether the clock on that worldline is at rest/moving/accelerating/whatever. However, if the clock is inertial and in its rest frame then the worldline ##P## is parallel to the time axis, although it need not be the axis itself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Orodruin said:
No, but it is what the OP asked about:
Yes, they were asking if P were a worldline on the time axis. That formula is valid for any timelike worldlines, not just ones on the time axis or parallel to it
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Dale said:
Yes, they were asking if P were a worldline on the time axis.
Not quite - the original post says (my emphasis)
Kashmir said:
In the integral
##
\Delta \tau=\int_P d \tau=\int \frac{d s}{c} ## , is the worldline a line on the time axis of the frame in which the clock is at rest?
...to which the answer is no, but it's a line parallel to the axis, at least if we understand that ##P## is the worldline of the clock.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and vanhees71
  • #10
Given a time-like line you can always construct local rest frames by Fermi-Walker transporting a tetrade along this world line.

Proper time is the time measured by a clock moving along an arbitrary time-like world line, and of course you don't need to construct the local rest frames to calculate it since it's an invariant/scalar. It's always given by
$$\mathrm{d} \tau =\sqrt{g_{\mu \nu} \dot{x}^{\mu} \dot{x}^{\nu}} \mathrm{d} \lambda/c,$$
where ##\lambda## is an arbitrary parameter for the time-like world line (I use the +--- signature for the pseudo-metric).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
841
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
278
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K