What is the density of the Carina Nebula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ozipin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Nebula
AI Thread Summary
The Carina Nebula's density is often misrepresented as a few atoms per cubic meter, which is closer to the average density of the intergalactic medium. In reality, the Carina Nebula, classified as a Giant Molecular Cloud (GMC), has a density that is significantly higher, estimated to be 100 to 1,000 times greater than the average density of the solar vicinity, which is about one atom per cubic centimeter. Scholarly references indicate that the density of interstellar matter varies widely, with the densest regions reaching up to 2 × 10−18 g cm−3. Translating column density to actual density is complex and requires specialized knowledge, making it challenging for those unfamiliar with the concepts. Accurate understanding of the Carina Nebula's density is crucial for astrophysical studies.
ozipin
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
In a James Webb photo thread, someone posted that the Carina Nebula has a density of a few atoms per cubic meter. This seems off to me, as this is close to the average density of the intergalactic medium of one atom per cubic meter, which is much less than the interstellar medium average density of one atom per cubic centimeter, which is much less than the average density of a planetary nebular (100-10,000 atoms per cubic centimeter). But I can't find any information on the web to help me understand this better.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I believe the Carina nebula is what is called a Giant Molecular Cloud (GMC). The Wikipedia article says the following: "Whereas the average density in the solar vicinity is one particle per cubic centimetre, the average density of a GMC is a hundred to a thousand times as great." The value of one atom/cubic meter is about the average mass density of the universe as a whole, so is much too low for even the vicinity of the sun, let alone a dense nebula like Carina.

For a more scholarly reference, this paper has the following quote, "By terrestrial standards, the interstellar matter is exceedingly tenuous: in the vicinity of the Sun, its density varies from ∼ 1.5 × 10−26 g cm−3 in the hot medium to ∼ 2 × 10−20 − 2 × 10−18 g cm−3 in the densest molecular regions, with an average of about 2.7 × 10−24 g cm−3 (see next subsections). This mass density, which corresponds to approximately one hydrogen atom per cubic centimeter, is over twenty orders of magnitude smaller than in the Earth’s lower atmosphere."
 
Ibix said:
which gives column densities
Translating column density to density requires some specialist knowledge, though. I'm not sure it helps the OP by itself.
 
Bandersnatch said:
Translating column density to density requires some specialist knowledge, though. I'm not sure it helps the OP by itself.
Sure - the reddit poster translated the column densities into a density range on an assumption that the nebula was about 15ly deep from our perspective.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top