What is the derivation of de Broglie wavelength and its relationship to energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the de Broglie wavelength and its relationship to energy, particularly focusing on the context in which different energy equations are equated. Participants explore the implications of this derivation, the nature of matter waves, and the appropriateness of teaching these concepts without a solid foundation in special relativity (SR).

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of equating the mass-energy equation (E=mc²) with the energy of a photon (E=hν), suggesting that it is inappropriate to use the rest mass of a photon in this context.
  • Another participant agrees, labeling the derivation as dubious and emphasizing that de Broglie wavelength is associated with momentum rather than rest mass.
  • A further contribution clarifies that when deriving the de Broglie wavelength, the relationship involves momentum (p) and not mass, leading to the expression λ=h/p.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of specification regarding the mass used in the derivation, with one participant noting that students often memorize formulas without understanding the underlying principles.
  • Questions are posed about the nature of matter waves, including whether they transport energy or represent probability functions, and the possibility of quantifying wave-like versus particle-like behavior in systems.
  • There is a suggestion that discussing these topics without a grounding in special relativity may not be appropriate for educational purposes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the validity of the derivation presented. There is no consensus on the appropriateness of the derivation or the context of the energy equations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the derivation, including the ambiguity of mass in the equations and the potential misunderstanding of the relationship between energy and momentum in the context of photons and matter waves.

arunbg
Messages
594
Reaction score
0
At school, I am taught that the "derivation" of de Brogle wavelength of a matter wave is as follows.

[tex]E=mc^2, E= h\nu[/tex]

So
[tex]mc^2=h\nu[/tex]

Then setting c=v by analogy derive the exp. for de Broglie wavelength.

Here's the problem, I can't understand in what context the two energies are equated.

I only know that the first eqn is mass energy equ. and the second eqn. is energy of a discrete photon.So obviously m must be the mass of photon
right? Now is this mass the rest mass of photon ? I don't even know much about SR other than the basic postulates.

Also what is the exact nature of matter waves?
Do they transport energy or are they probability functions?
Is it possible to approximate how much of a system is wave like and and how much of it is particle like ?

I don't think it is really right to deal with these topics before SR as they do in my syllabus. What do you think?

Thanks in advance for the replies.Any links will also be appreciated.

Arun
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you're right to question this 'derivation'... because its stupid!
E doesn't equal mc^2 for a photon, so imo you can't really equate the first two formulae you've quoted
 
To further the "derivation" what is done is that c->v

[tex]mv^2=h\frac{v}{\lambda}[/tex]

so [tex]\lambda=\frac{h}{mv}=\frac{h}{p}[/tex]

And it is not specified what mass is m .
Students in my school (my final exams got over today, phew!) simply mug up the formula and apply to problems.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K