What is the derivation of the identity (dS/dV)T=(dP/dT)V in thermodynamics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the identity (dS/dV)T=(dP/dT)V in thermodynamics, specifically relating to the concepts of exact differentials and thermodynamic potentials. The original poster expresses confusion about how this identity is derived from the fundamental thermodynamic equation dU=TdS-PdV.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between thermodynamic potentials, particularly the Helmholtz function, and the identity in question. They discuss the application of Clairaut's theorem and the use of differential forms to understand the derivation. Questions arise about the notation used, such as the wedge product, and its implications in the context of partial derivatives.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants sharing insights about the use of thermodynamic functions and the properties of differentials. Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the derivation using differential forms, while others express confusion about the mathematical notation and concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of explicit references to the Helmholtz function in the original problem statement, which some participants find challenging. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the mathematical notation, particularly regarding the wedge product and its interpretation in thermodynamics.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


If dU=TdS-PdV then
(dS/dV)T=(dP/dT)V

the T and V at the end means that T and V are constant
How did they get this identity? It came from a thermodynamics hence for their notations.

I have tried ways like rearranging but it doesn't seem to work. I think it has something to do with exact differentials.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the Helmholtz function?
 
by Clairaut's theorem,
let [itex]z=z(x,y)[/tex]<br /> [tex]\left ( \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x\partial y}\right )=\left ( \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y\partial x}\right )[/tex]<br /> <br /> or more explicitly, using "thermodynamic notations":<br /> [tex]\left [\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left ( \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right )_y\right ]_x=\left [\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left ( \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}\right )_x\right ]_y[/tex]<br /> <br /> then look at:<br /> [tex]F=U-TS[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]dF=-SdT-PdV[/tex]<br /> so F is a function of T and V, ie. [itex]F=F(T,V)[/tex] (when N is treated as a constant)[/itex][/itex]
 
Last edited:
I see. The Clairaut's theorem is a formal way of stating exact differentials isn't it?

Helmholtz function is F=U-TS and sub dU=TdS-PdV and apply Clairaut's theorem.

Using F=U-TS was the important bit. The sheet didn't mention Helmoholtz anywhere so it would have been hard to know what to use in order to derive the relation. Wouldn't you say?
 
not really.. hehe, looking at the derivatives you posted. One easily notice that the variables involved are V and T.

so you should know the one thermodynamic potential that is a function of V and T. (which is F)

in general, you have
U(S,V)
H(S,P)
F(T,V)
G(T,P)

H=U+PV
F=U-TS
G=U-TS+PV

so when you see an identity, check what variables it involves and use the appropriate thermodynamic functions.
 
Last edited:
There's a neat calculation involving differential forms.
[tex]0=d(dU)=d(TdS-PdV)=dT \wedge dS+Td(dS) - dP\wedge dV-Pd(dV)=dT\wedge dS-dP\wedge dV[/tex]
Then write
[tex]dS=\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V dT + \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_T dV[/tex]
and
[tex]dP=\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V dT + \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial V}\right)_T dV[/tex].
Note that [tex]dT\wedge dT=0[/tex] and [tex]dT\wedge dV= - dV\wedge dT[/tex].
 
tim_lou said:
not really.. hehe, looking at the derivatives you posted. One easily notice that the variables involved are V and T.

so you should know the one thermodynamic potential that is a function of V and T. (which is F)

in general, you have
U(S,V)
H(S,P)
F(T,V)
G(T,P)

H=U+PV
F=U-TS
G=U-TS+PV

so when you see an identity, check what variables it involves and use the appropriate thermodynamic functions.

OK. But you could interchange these functions couldn't you to get them into different variables intermingled together.

robphy said:
There's a neat calculation involving differential forms.
[tex]0=d(dU)=d(TdS-PdV)=dT \wedge dS+Td(dS) - dP\wedge dV-Pd(dU)=dT\wedge dS-dP\wedge dV[/tex]
Then write
[tex]dS=\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V dT + \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_T dV[/tex]
and
[tex]dP=\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V dT + \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial V}\right)_T dV[/tex].
Note that [tex]dT\wedge dT=0[/tex] and [tex]dT\wedge dV= - dV\wedge dT[/tex].

What is the upside down V in the equations?
 
the notation looks insane.

just one question, why does d(dU)=0??

and I am very confused by the info from mathworld...

so
[tex]dT\wedge dS[/tex]

equals what in terms of partial derivatives?

is it like a vector cross product or something like that?
suppose a=a(x,y), b=b(x,y)

what would
[tex]da\wedge db[/tex]
be?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
tim_lou said:
the notation looks insane.

just one question, why does d(dU)=0??
This comes from the definition of the exterior derivative
and I am very confused by the info from mathworld...

so
[tex]dT\wedge dS[/tex]

equals what in terms of partial derivatives?
Plug dS and dP into the first equation in robphy's post.
is it like a vector cross product or something like that?
suppose a=a(x,y), b=b(x,y)

what would
[tex]da\wedge db[/tex]
be?

Look up the exterior derivative above.
 
  • #11
wow.. thanks for the info. differential forms are awesome! time for me to pick up a book on such topic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
29K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K