A What is the difference between aggregation, nucleation and growth?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the differences between aggregation, nucleation, and growth in the context of crystal formation. Aggregation refers to the process where two or more particles stick together, while nucleation is the initiation of crystal formation from a state of 'zero.' Growth involves the increase in size of existing crystals from a non-zero state. Coalescence is mentioned as a softer process that may occur in the liquid phase or during early solid formation, though its exact definition remains unclear to participants. The conversation emphasizes a focus on crystallization rather than biological processes.
Sciencestd
Messages
60
Reaction score
9
Im bit confused about what is exactly the difference between the terms, which process every term describes ?
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Physics news on Phys.org
aggregation: two or more stick together
nucleation: a start from 'zero'
growth: from non-zero to a little more

We are talking crystals here, I hope ? (i.e. nothing biological :wink: )
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Sciencestd and etotheipi
BvU said:
aggregation: two or more stick together
nucleation: a start from 'zero'
growth: from non-zero to a little more

We are talking crystals here, I hope ? (i.e. nothing biological :wink: )
Thank you so much for the answer :) , yes I'm talking about crystals and nothing biological :D
Then the coalescence which process it describes?
 
A further question ! My answer: don't really know. Didn't encounter it so far. Googled 'crystal coalescence and aggregation' and get the impression coalescence is softer (either it happens in the liquid phase, or comes down to a near perfect match in the early solid phase -- but I speculate)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.00771.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Sciencestd
BvU said:
A further question ! My answer: don't really know. Didn't encounter it so far. Googled 'crystal coalescence and aggregation' and get the impression coalescence is softer (either it happens in the liquid phase, or comes down to a near perfect match in the early solid phase -- but I speculate)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.00771.pdf

The link is really useful thank you :)
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top