What is the Difference Between Kinetic Energy and Power in Ballistics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of kinetic energy and power within the context of ballistics. Participants explore the definitions, units of measurement, and the relationship between kinetic energy and power, particularly focusing on the role of time in these calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the definition of kinetic energy and its units, questioning why time appears to be omitted from the final result of kinetic energy calculations.
  • Another participant clarifies that a pound is a unit of force, not mass, and introduces the concept of "slug" as the unit of mass.
  • Some participants discuss the dual nature of the pound as both a unit of mass and force, noting the importance of context in determining which is being referenced.
  • There is mention of the need to apply the equation F=ma to convert units to work, suggesting that the relationship between force and energy is crucial for understanding the units involved.
  • One participant emphasizes that kinetic energy is measured in foot-pounds, which is defined as the energy required to raise a one-pound weight one foot, and questions the absence of time in the kinetic energy formula.
  • Another participant performs a dimensional analysis of kinetic energy, breaking down the units and showing how they relate to work, but still questions the absence of time in the final units.
  • Some participants express difficulty in understanding the distinction between kinetic energy and momentum, noting that both involve mass and velocity but are calculated differently.
  • One participant states that kinetic energy represents the capacity to do work, linking it to the force exerted over a distance, while another seeks clarification on why kinetic energy is defined as it is compared to momentum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the confusion surrounding the units of kinetic energy and the role of time in the calculations. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the definitions and relationships between kinetic energy, power, and momentum.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the definitions of units and the application of formulas, as well as the potential for confusion arising from the dual use of pounds as both mass and force. There is also an unresolved exploration of the implications of time in the context of kinetic energy.

arizonaguide
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Okay, I'm confused and need someone smarter than me to explain something to me about Kinetic Energy.

In studying some Ballistics concepts...I have ran across the definition of Kinetic Energy thus:

"one half the mass of the body times the square of its speed" or 1/2Mass x Velocity^2

And in ballistics, the KE numbers are measured in FtLbs...and this is what throws me.

I understand that mass can be measured in LBS, but Velocity is not just measured in Feet...but in Feet Per Second! So what the heck happened to the Seconds in the KE result?

Example: 1/2mass of a 10lb cannonball is 5lb, so 1/2M=5lb.
Velocity^2 of it moving at 10fps would be 100fps.
Using the formula for KE we end with a product result of 500FtLb.

HOW did we drop the "seconds" from velocity in the formula result...and why are we not measuring kinetic energy in FtLb/second? (I know this is actually a measurement for "power", so why am I confusing "Kinetic Energy" with "Power"?) How are they different? What happened to the "time factor" in the Energy equation...if velocity is a part of the formula?

Thanks for ANY clarification.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A pound is not a unit of mass, contrary to popular belief. A pound is a force. The unit of mass is the Slug.
 
The confusion stems from the units. The pound is both a unit of mass and a unit of force (the weight of a 1 pound mass). Sometimes you will see a pound mass written as "lbm" and a pound force written as "lbf". Otherwise you have to determine from the context which is being used. In this case it is referring to a pound force.
 
...so the units ft-lb don't come from that equation directly: you have to apply f=ma to convert the units to units of work.
 
Pengwuino said:
A pound is not a unit of mass, contrary to popular belief. A pound is a force. The unit of mass is the Slug.
Okay, I agree that the pound (weight) is the measurement that gravity exerts on mass, but sadly in common ballistics we end up measuring the mass of a bullet (here on earth) in "grains" which is a measurement of weight...from the avoirdupois system, which uses 7,000-grain pound.

So, to simplify we still measure bullets in a fraction of a pound, and calculate KE energy in units of "feet" (distance) and "pounds" (weight).

Consider that my question is being asked here on the surface of the Earth and not on the moon where the "force" of the pound would change. So, we use the "weight" to calculate the "1/2M" part of the KE formula as standard. Correct?

Example: 1/2mass of a 10lb cannonball is 5lb, so 1/2M=5lb.

and the Velocity (of my example above) was 10fps, so Velocity^2 would = 100fps

In the KE formula those two are multipled together (5lb x 100fps) and a result of 500FtLb is created.

I don't see anywhere that F=MA is applied in that formula...and the "seconds" (time) part of the velocity just seems to be "conveniently" dropped/ignored...to create a result of KE (in FtLb).

Something's wrong with that picture. The "seconds" are just "dropped" from the result.

Perhaps I'm not understanding the difference between "Kinetic Energy" and "Power".

I'm not sure where I'm going wrong here...but somehow the TIME factor of velocity is just "dropped" from the KE equation's final units. That bothers me.
 
Last edited:
To clarify further...a KE "Foot-Pound" is measured here on the Earth's surface as the Energy required to raise a 1LB weight a vertical distance of 1FT. This makes no mention of Velocity units...yet velocity is one of the variables in the KE formula.

Simply,

1.) So if kinetic energy of the projectile is measured in FtLb,

and 2.) one of the KE formula's multipliers is "Velocity"...

then 3.) where is the complete Velocity Unit (to include time) in the result?

Why do we throw away the TIME factor of velocity in the KE result? Shouldn't the KE result be in FtLb/second rather than just FtLb? (as a full measure of the "capacity to do work")
 
Last edited:
Do a dimensional analysis
[L] = length
[T] = time
[M] = mass
kinetic energy = ½mv²
velocity is [L][T]‾¹
so kinetic energy is [M][L]²[T]‾²
A foot pound is a measure of work: force times distance.
The pound is a measure of force here.
Force is defined from F=ma
acceleration is [L][T]‾²
so force is [M][L][T]‾²
foot pound is [L][M][L][T]‾²
foot pound is [M][L]²[T]‾²
 
So, where is the "unit of time" in the FtLb result?
Shouldn't it be FtLb/second?

Do we measure Velocity or acceleration in the Ballistic formula?
(1/2M x Velocity^2). (how do you "square" the time factor of velocity?)
 
Energy is something difficult for me to understand. I know the formulas and I see its evidence and effect/affect, but I don't quite fully grasp it For instance, why is KE (and there are different forms of energy) described as = 1/2m (v squared) and momentum described as = mv. Both address the the mass and velocity of an object but in very different ways. Why is only half the value of mass, and the squared value of velocity used in the calculation of KE? We say it's energy (the combination of mass and velocity) that causes bullet and tissue deformation, but why isn't it momentum?
 
  • #10
arizonaguide said:
Energy is something difficult for me to understand. I know the formulas and I see its evidence and effect/affect, but I don't quite fully grasp it
Energy is the capacity to do work and work is a force times a distance. So kinetic energy is simply the capacity that a moving object has to crash into something and thereby exert a force on it over some distance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K