What is the difference between the old and new wave function equations?

QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Not a homework problem, just a general question that I find confusing.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



So, back in Trigonometry and Classical Mechanics I learned that the equation that best represents a wave. Now, Solving the differential equation that is the wave function gives this:
[tex]f(x,t)=Y_{m}cos(kx-ωt)[/tex]

What has me confused is the new "phase", specifically that it's not ωt+[itex]\phi[/itex].

I gather that k is the wave number, well, the number of wavelengths per unit distance, x is the distance down the wave of course. ω is now the Angular Frequency (not velocity!), which is simply the number of rotations per unit time more or less. So if ω is 2π over the period, what exactly is that other t representing? Seems like it's unit would cancel with ω which is clearly desired, but I just don't see how this whole thing is working exactly.

I can do any of the rote number-plugging homework problems assigned to me, but I simply don't see the relationship between this newer (for me) wave funtion and the one with [itex]\phi[/itex] that I am more familiar with. I can't even find a resource outside my text pertaining to this equation, all searches yield the equation with phi.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phi just shifts time or position a bit, if you set your clocks right you can make phi go away.

Your old function which just involved time might describe the position of a vibrating mass connected to a spring.

The new function might describe a wave on a vibrating string, the height of the string now depends on both time and where you are along the string.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K