What is the difference between the old and new wave function equations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the differences between the traditional wave function equation and the newer formulation. The older equation, represented as f(x,t) = Y_{m}cos(kx - ωt), is contrasted with the newer phase representation, which omits the phase constant φ. Key terms such as wave number (k) and angular frequency (ω) are defined, emphasizing that ω represents the number of rotations per unit time. The conversation highlights the evolution from a simple model of a vibrating mass to a more complex model of a wave on a vibrating string, illustrating the dependency on both time and spatial position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and differential equations
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their applications
  • Knowledge of angular frequency and wave number concepts
  • Basic grasp of classical mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the wave function in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of phase shifts in wave equations
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of waves on strings
  • Investigate the relationship between angular frequency and wave speed
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics, as well as educators and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of wave function equations and their applications in various physical contexts.

QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Not a homework problem, just a general question that I find confusing.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



So, back in Trigonometry and Classical Mechanics I learned that the equation that best represents a wave. Now, Solving the differential equation that is the wave function gives this:
[tex]f(x,t)=Y_{m}cos(kx-ωt)[/tex]

What has me confused is the new "phase", specifically that it's not ωt+[itex]\phi[/itex].

I gather that k is the wave number, well, the number of wavelengths per unit distance, x is the distance down the wave of course. ω is now the Angular Frequency (not velocity!), which is simply the number of rotations per unit time more or less. So if ω is 2π over the period, what exactly is that other t representing? Seems like it's unit would cancel with ω which is clearly desired, but I just don't see how this whole thing is working exactly.

I can do any of the rote number-plugging homework problems assigned to me, but I simply don't see the relationship between this newer (for me) wave funtion and the one with [itex]\phi[/itex] that I am more familiar with. I can't even find a resource outside my text pertaining to this equation, all searches yield the equation with phi.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phi just shifts time or position a bit, if you set your clocks right you can make phi go away.

Your old function which just involved time might describe the position of a vibrating mass connected to a spring.

The new function might describe a wave on a vibrating string, the height of the string now depends on both time and where you are along the string.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K