What is the difference between the two 4-momenta in photon-electron collisions?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AishaGirl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between two representations of 4-momenta in the context of photon-electron collisions, specifically focusing on the use of units in expressing these quantities. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conventions in particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the 4-momentum before a photon collides with a stationary electron should be expressed as \(P_m=(mc^2,0,0,0)\) or \(P_m=(mc,0,0,0)\).
  • Another participant notes that the four-momentum is typically expressed in units of momentum, suggesting \( (mc,0,0,0) \), and mentions the common practice of using units where \(c=1\).
  • A participant trained in experimental particle physics expresses a preference for using energy units \( (E, p_x c, p_y c, p_z c) \), while acknowledging that others may prefer momentum units \( (E/c, p_x, p_y, p_z) \).
  • There is a discussion about whether the term "four momentum" is still applicable when using energy units, with a participant affirming that they do not differentiate between the two in their practice.
  • Another participant recalls that during their graduate studies, it was common to refer to momentum in units of MeV and GeV, while still using the terms (3-)momentum or 4-momentum as appropriate.
  • A participant confirms that using \( (mc,0,0,0) \) is as valid as using \( (mc^2,0,0,0) \), emphasizing the importance of consistency in conventions.
  • One participant elaborates on their preferred convention, stating that if \(c \neq 1\), they prefer to express four-vector quantities with dimensions of the spatial parts, providing a detailed formulation of the energy-momentum relation.
  • The same participant describes the 4-momentum for a photon, indicating that its energy is related to its momentum through the relation \(E_{\gamma}(\vec{k})=c |\vec{k}|\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing preferences regarding the representation of 4-momenta and the units used, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a clear consensus on which representation is superior.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of consistency in unit conventions and the implications of using different units, but do not resolve the debate over which representation is more appropriate.

AishaGirl
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The 4-momenta before a photon collides with a stationary election P_m=(mc^2,0,0,0) or is it P_m=(mc,0,0,0)

Which is the difference between the two?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The four momentum is usually written in units of momentum, so (mc,0,0,0). However, it is even more common to use units where c=1, so that energy momentum and mass are all the same unit.
 
AishaGirl said:
Which is the difference between the two?
Units of energy versus units of momentum. I was trained in experimental particle physics, so I prefer units of energy ##(E, p_x c, p_y c, p_z c)## but I recognize that others prefer units of momentum ##(E/c, p_x, p_y, p_z)##. Whichever units you prefer, be consistent within a calculation!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SiennaTheGr8, AishaGirl and vanhees71
jtbell said:
I was trained in experimental particle physics, so I prefer units of energy
Interesting, does the particle physics community still call it the four momentum if they commonly use energy units?
 
Dale said:
Interesting, does the particle physics community still call it the four momentum if they commonly use energy units?
We do not differentiate between the two since we use units where c=1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and PeroK
When I was a grad student it was general practice to talk of momentum in units of MeV and GeV.

But we nevertheless called it (3-)momentum or 4-momentum as appropriate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Thanks for the replies. So using (mc,0,0,0) is just as valid as using (mc^2,0,0,0) ?
 
Sure, you only must be consistent with your convention or, most elegantly, set ##c=1##, as the particle physicists do (see the postings above). If I keep ##c \neq 1##, then I usually prefer to use the convention that the four-vector quantities have the dimension of the spatial parts, i.e., for momentum
$$(p^{\mu})=\begin{pmatrix} E/c \\ \vec{p} \end{pmatrix},$$
where ##E=c \sqrt{m^2 c^2+\vec{p}^2}## is the relativistic energy (i.e., kinetic + rest energy) of the particle. Then the energy-momentum relation (often called "on-shell condition") can be written in manifestly covariant form as
$$p_{\mu} p^{\mu}=m^2 c^2.$$

For the photon of momentum ##\vec{k}##, following thie convention you have
$$(k^{\mu}) = \begin{pmatrix} |\vec{k}|,\vec{k} \end{pmatrix}.$$
Because it's massless the energy of the photon is ##E_{\gamma}(\vec{k})=c |\vec{k}|##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and AishaGirl

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
929
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K