MHB What is the distance of closest approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter Another1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach
Click For Summary
The distance of closest approach from a point to a line can be calculated using the formula \( d(P,L) = \dfrac{|\vec{Pr_0} \times \vec{A} |}{|\vec{A}|} \). To find the shortest distance from the point on the line defined by \( r(t) = \langle 3 + 2t, -1 - 2t, 1 + t \rangle \) to the origin, the distance formula \( \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2} \) is used. By minimizing the squared distance \( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \), the expression simplifies to \( 10t^2 + 18t + 11 \). Completing the square reveals that the minimum occurs at \( t = -0.9 \), yielding a minimum distance value of 2.9. This method effectively determines the distance of closest approach.
Another1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Ln1.png


from problem I find \[ r = r_0 + At \] \[ x_0 = 3 + 2t\] \[ y_0 = -1 - 2t\] \[ z_0 = 1 + t\] and \[ A = (2,-2,1)\]
but i don't understand What is the distance of closest approach?
someone tell me to a formula please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If $P$ is a point in space, and $L$ is the line $r(t) = \vec{r_0} + \vec{A} t$ , then

$d(P,L) = \dfrac{|\vec{Pr_0} \times \vec{A} |}{|\vec{A}|}$
 
Another said:
View attachment 10653
from problem I find \[ r = r_0 + At \] \[ x_0 = 3 + 2t\] \[ y_0 = -1 - 2t\] \[ z_0 = 1 + t\] and \[ A = (2,-2,1)\]

you haven't actually written the path in the form r= r0+ At. It is, of course, r= <3, -1, 1>+ <2, -2, 1>t.
but i don't understand What is the distance of closest approach?

someone tell me to a formula please.

It is the shortest possible distance from a point, (x(t), y(t), z(r)), on the graph to the origin, (0, 0, 0). The "formula" you want is the distance formula. The distance from (x, y, z) to the origin is $\sqrt{x^2+ y^2+ z^2}$. "Minimizing" that distance is the same as minimizing the square- $x^2+ y^2+ z^2= (3+ 2t)^2+ (-1- 2t)^2+ (1+ t)^2= 9+ 12t+ 4t^2+ 1+ 4t+ 4t^2+ 1+ 2t+ t^2= 11+ 18t+ 10t^2$. You can minimize that by setting the derivative equal to 0 or by "completing the square".
To complete the square, $10t^2+ 18t+ 11= 10(t^2+ 1.8t)+ 11= 10(t^2+ 1.8t+ 0.81- 0.81)+ 11= 10(t+ .9)^2- 8.1+ 11= 10(t+ .9)^2+ 2.9. Since a square is never negative, that is smallest when t= -0.9 where its value is 2.9.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K