What is the Effect of Nanotube Length on Reflectance in Nanotechnology?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of nanotube length on reflectance in titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanotubes within the context of nanotechnology. Participants explore the relationship between nanotube dimensions, dielectric constants, absorption, and reflectance across specific wavelengths of light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant observes that as the length of TiO2 nanotubes increases, reflectance also appears to increase, linking this to the dielectric constant and refractive index.
  • Another participant questions the specifics of the observations, asking about the type of nanotubes, their length scale relative to light wavelengths, and the material in question.
  • A participant clarifies that they are studying bulk TiO2 nanotubes with lengths ranging from 300nm to 1700nm.
  • Concerns are raised about the absorption characteristics of TiO2 in the visible spectrum, suggesting that it should not have strong absorption in the wavelengths of interest (600nm-1100nm).
  • Questions are posed regarding the relationship between reflectance and dielectric constant, particularly how these properties might vary with nanotube length.
  • One participant references the Fresnel equations and Kramers-Kronig relations to discuss the theoretical underpinnings of reflectance and absorption.
  • Another participant introduces the complexity of collective scattering in nanotubes and suggests using effective medium theories or numerical simulations for analysis.
  • Requests for resources and articles on theoretical simulations and collective scattering are made, indicating a desire for further exploration of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the absorption characteristics of TiO2 and its implications for reflectance. There is no consensus on the relationship between nanotube length, dielectric constant, and reflectance, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of interactions in collective scattering and the potential limitations of effective medium theories. There is also uncertainty regarding the specific absorption characteristics of TiO2 in the discussed wavelength range.

ralden
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
hi guys, I'm working about nanotechnology, and my current research is about nanotubes. Based on my observation, as the nanotubes length increased the reflectance also increased, one of my possible explanation is that; since dielectric constant is dependent on the dimension of the material, and refractive index is directly proportional to dielectric constant, and since reflectance may expressed in terms of refractive indices, therefore, as dielectric constant increased reflectance also increased, but i must also considered the absorption of that material, what happen to the absorption when nanotubes length increased? is it also affect the reflectance? please shared your knowledge and opinion. thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Maybe you could be a little bit more specific: Are you observing single nanotubes, solutions or bulk material? About what length scale are you taking, specifically larger or smaller than the wavelength of light? What kind and and of which material are the nanotubes?
 
A bulk material, having a length range from 300nm-1700nm. I'm studying titanium dioxide nanotubes,
 
Ok.
Generally, absorption also affects reflectivity. I would not consider this important for TiO2 in the visible. What wavelengths are you interested in?
 
actually I'm interested on the reflectance of increasing length of TiO2 nanotubes. since tiO2 have no reflection at 400nm-500nm wavelength because of its band gap that absorbed those em waves, then i focused on the wavelengths around 600nm-1100nm that gives refletance, what you think?
 
I would be astonished if TiO2 had strong absorptions in this range. After all, it is used as a white pigment, so it can't be absorptive in the visible (say 800 to 400 nm). I also see no mechanism for absorption in the near IR. Absorption would have to be rather strong to change reflectivity.
 
ok. so what is the relationship between the reflectance and dielectric constant of the sample? is it varies with length of nanotubes, same to the absorption that varies also with thickness?
 
Reflectance is given by the Fresnel equations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations
and ##n=\sqrt{\epsilon}##, so the first part of your question should be clear.
The real part of the dielectric constant n and the absorbance κ are related by Kramers Kronig relations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramers-Kronig_relation, which is rather involved.
My first guess why epsilon increases with increasing length would be an increase in sample density. After all, a single slab of TiO2 has a larger density than two close packed slabs of half the length.
 
Ralden, this is a case of collective scattering and its treatment is quite complex. I know it from experience since I have worked with scattering by metallic spherical nanoparticles. Each fiber can be treated as a cylinder for which solving Maxwell equations is relatively easy but the problem comes when you have to consider the interaction between the waves scattered by each cylinder. The problem can be treated analytically using so called effective medium theories, but from my experience they are not very precise. You can think of an effective refractive index which increases with volume fraction of the high refractive index medium and therefore reflectance too (you just substitute the effective index in Fresnel equations already cited). The other possibility is EM numerical simulation, using e.g. FDTD, which is the best method since it solves "exactly" Maxwell equations. In fact, exactness depends only on your computer power available.
 
  • #10
Hi Alkim, may you give me links of articles and studies about the theoretical simulation of the collective scattering, or the FDTD? thanks :)
 
  • #11
Hi Ralden, there is a lot of bibliography, you can start with wikipedia and articles, books and codes cited therein:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scattering
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_scattering_by_particles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_medium_approximations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite-difference_time-domain_method
https://code.google.com/p/scatterlib/

Also, a quick search about scattering by cylinders rendered some interesting links, see e.g.: http://inis.jinr.ru/sl/vol2/Physics...DBOOK_of_OPTICS/HANDBOOK_of_OPTICS/v1ch06.pdf This guy is a capacity in the field.

this may also give you some orientation:
http://eos.wdcb.ru/transl/izva/9404/pap06.htm

And this too:
http://books.google.es/books?id=qT3...scattering from cylindrical particles&f=false

If you need anything else, just let me know it.
Best regards
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
21K