What is the electric field just at the shell?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field at a spherical shell with uniform charge is zero inside and can be calculated outside as if all charge were concentrated at the center. At the shell's surface (r=R), the field is discontinuous due to the idealization of a zero-thickness shell, which does not exist in reality. Instead, any shell has a finite thickness where the electric field varies continuously. For conducting shells, the electric field is described by a step function, and the integral form of Gauss's Law is essential for calculating the electric field in different regions: inside the shell (r < a), within the shell's thickness (a ≤ r ≤ b), and outside the shell (r > b).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric fields and charge distributions
  • Knowledge of spherical symmetry in electrostatics
  • Basic concepts of conducting and non-conducting materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integral form of Gauss's Law for various charge distributions
  • Learn how to calculate electric fields for spherical shells of finite thickness
  • Explore the concept of electric fields in conducting materials
  • Investigate the implications of quantum mechanics on charge localization
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields in charged spherical shells.

Isaac@
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Here's the question I am thinking about:
If there is a spherical shell with uniform charge on it, I know the electric field inside the shell is zero and that outside the shell is calculated just the same with a single charge at the center of the sphere, but how about the field just at the shell (r=R)?
I try to solve this problem by Gauss' Law. I can draw a gaussian surface just above and below the shell, but when I try to draw just at the shell, how many charges does the surface enclose? The charges are assumed to be infinitely small. When they are just at the gaussian surface, are they enclosed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Undefined. There is a discontinuity in the field strength right at the shell.

Physically, this is no problem because there is no such thing as a uniformly charged, infinitely thin spherical shell. Charge is discrete, not uniform. In addition, quantum mechanics imposes limitations on the extent to which charge can be localized to such a sharply defined shape.
 
A zero-thickness shell is an idealization. In practice any shell has a finite thickness, across which the electric field varies continuously from one side to the other. It's a common exercise to calculate the electric field for a charged spherical shell of finite thickness, inside the shell (r < a), within the thickness of the shell (a ≤ r ≤ b), and outside the shell (r > b).

Even with a conducting shell, for which all the charge resides on the surface in electrostatics, the charge layer has a small but nonzero thickness, although we usually idealize it as zero thickness. In that case the electric field is described by a step function.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thank you for all your replies! I understand now.:smile:
 
jtbell said:
A zero-thickness shell is an idealization. In practice any shell has a finite thickness, across which the electric field varies continuously from one side to the other. It's a common exercise to calculate the electric field for a charged spherical shell of finite thickness, inside the shell (r < a), within the thickness of the shell (a ≤ r ≤ b), and outside the shell (r > b).

Even with a conducting shell, for which all the charge resides on the surface in electrostatics, the charge layer has a small but nonzero thickness, although we usually idealize it as zero thickness. In that case the electric field is described by a step function.
And can you tell me exactly how to fild field in case of a conducting shell of some thickness. specially the a<r<b case
thanks
 
Use the integral form of Gauss's law, similarly to any other spherically symmetric charge distribution. Take care to find the "enclosed charge" appropriately for r in the various regions: r < a, a < r < b, and r > b.

If you know Gauss's law but have trouble with the details, post your attempt in our Introductory Physics Homework forum and someone will probably be able to help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K