What is the EMF generated in a Straight Conductor?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electromotive force (EMF) generated in a straight conductor of length L placed in a time-varying magnetic field described by B.cos(ωt). The derived formula for EMF is EMF = -B.L.ω.cos(ωt), which is based on the transformer EMF formula. Participants emphasize the need for the correct vector equation for calculating EMF in a wire within a changing magnetic field, highlighting that the absence of an enclosed area results in zero induced EMF, which contradicts the principles of transformers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic induction principles
  • Familiarity with the transformer EMF formula
  • Knowledge of vector calculus in physics
  • Basic concepts of magnetic fields and their variations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the general vector equation for calculating EMF in a wire within a changing magnetic field
  • Study the principles of electromagnetic induction and Faraday's law
  • Explore the relationship between magnetic flux and induced EMF in transformers
  • Examine practical applications of EMF in straight conductors in varying magnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching electromagnetic theory, and engineers working with electromagnetic systems will benefit from this discussion.

kpsr
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the EMF generated in a straight conductor of length L placed in a time varying magnetic field B as
shown in the below figure..
Img_zps0twbecya.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Time varying magnetic field is B.cosωt,
EMF = (d/dx)(B.L.cosωt) = -B.L.ω.cosωt
I don't know this result true or not Please correct me..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kpsr said:

Homework Statement


What is the EMF generated in a straight conductor of length L placed in a time varying magnetic field B as
shown in the below figure..
Img_zps0twbecya.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Time varying magnetic field is B.cosωt,
EMF = (d/dx)(B.L.cosωt) = -B.L.ω.cosωt
I don't know this result true or not Please correct me..
What is the original vector equation that is usually used to calculate this type of problem? :smile:
 
berkeman said:
What is the original vector equation that is usually used to calculate this type of problem? :smile:
In my above attempt I have used the transformer emf formula, in that formula I just used a straight conductor instead of a coil..
I saw that result in a website a long time ago and that site is not available right now. that's why i am not sure about the result.
 
kpsr said:
In my above attempt I have used the transformer emf formula, in that formula I just used a straight conductor instead of a coil..
I saw that result in a website a long time ago and that site is not available right now. that's why i am not sure about the result.
Assume that you just have a rod without a voltmeter. You have "Free" electrons inside the wire.
Okay so it is stationary right? What does that tell you about the forces acting on the electrons?
If I calculate the work done by these forces it is equal to the voltage so what do you find?Now let's say you want to check your results in a lab, You brought a voltmeter and connected it to the rod. Would you expect the result to be the same as the above? and Why? What law should you used here?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rude man and berkeman
kpsr said:
In my above attempt I have used the transformer emf formula, in that formula I just used a straight conductor instead of a coil..
I saw that result in a website a long time ago and that site is not available right now. that's why i am not sure about the result.
That is not the fundamental vector equation for this problem. If you are not familiar with that equation, it will take a bit more work to help you with this. What class is this for? What level in university or high school? :smile:
 
I have searched a lot, Please check the file from here ...
In this file Case(i) is the problem i mentioned in my post,
Please explain/elaborate Case(i) emf for me.
 
Last edited:
kpsr said:
Please explain/elaborate Case(i) emf for me.
Since this is a schoolwork-type question, our site rules require us to try to get you to figure it out on your own, rather than giving you the answer.
kpsr said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Time varying magnetic field is B.cosωt,
EMF = (d/dx)(B.L.cosωt) = -B.L.ω.cosωt
I don't know this result true or not Please correct me..
You didn't answer my question yet -- do you know the general vector equation that is used to calculate the EMF of a wire in a changing magnetic field? That is how you should approach this problem, rather than using simplifications of the equation like you posted above. If you're not sure which equation it is, just Google for calculate EMF in a wire from a changing magnetic field... :smile:
 
berkeman said:
You didn't answer my question yet -- do you know the general vector equation that is used to calculate the EMF of a wire in a changing magnetic field? That is how you should approach this problem, rather than using simplifications of the equation like you posted above. If you're not sure which equation it is, just Google for calculate EMF in a wire from a changing magnetic field... :smile:
I googled a lot and every time what i can found is the emf generated only for a conductor coil/loop in a changing magnetic field (B.cosωt),
and that general vector equation is
Emf_zpsbcl1aoox.jpg

or
Emf-1_zpsa2tcyajn.jpg

Here N is the number of turns in coil, A is the area of the coil and hence B.A is the flux Φ linked with that coil.
But what i am talking about a straight conductor with N almost 1 and there is no area A except length L.
that's why i replaced the flux BA from above equations with BL ,correct my approach...
 
kpsr said:
I googled a lot and every time what i can found is the emf generated only for a conductor coil/loop in a changing magnetic field (B.cosωt),
and that general vector equation is
Emf_zpsbcl1aoox.jpg

or
Emf-1_zpsa2tcyajn.jpg

Here N is the number of turns in coil, A is the area of the coil and hence B.A is the flux Φ linked with that coil.
But what i am talking about a straight conductor with N almost 1 and there is no area A except length L.
that's why i replaced the flux BA from above equations with BL ,correct my approach...
Good. So if there is no area enclosed, the induced EMF would be... :smile:
 
  • #10
berkeman said:
Good. So if there is no area enclosed, the induced EMF would be... :smile:
the induced EMF would be zero.. But that must be not correct, as from the working principle of transformers there must be an emf given by the Case(i) from the file or may be else, that what really confusing me, please clarify it..
 
  • #11
kpsr said:
the induced EMF would be zero.. But that must be not correct, as from the working principle of transformers there must be an emf given by the Case(i) from the file or may be else, that what really confusing me, please clarify it..
What is "Case(i)"? A transformer has an EMF induced by the changing magnetic field that pierces the coils because the coils have area. So the B dot dA term in the equation is non-zero...
Emf-1_zpsa2tcyajn.jpg
 
  • #12
berkeman said:
What is "Case(i)"? A transformer has an EMF induced by the changing magnetic field that pierces the coils because the coils have area. So the B dot dA term in the equation is non-zero...
Emf-1_zpsa2tcyajn.jpg
The Case(i) transformer Emf across a straight conductor of length L due to non-uniform magnetic field (B.cosωt) is
Emf-2_zps2se2jk72.jpg

Here also changing magnetic field (B.cosωt) pierces the straight conductor of length L, it's not a coil so there is only L in formula not area dA.
the above formula is not my own it's derived from this file here ...
my only question is that the result from the file is correct or not..?
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K