What is the energy density of a linear dielectric and why is it confusing?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dEdt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dielectric Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The energy density of a linear dielectric is defined by the equation u = (1/2) D · E, where D is the electric displacement field and E is the electric field. The proof involves integrating the change in free charge density and its effect on potential energy, leading to the conclusion that the total energy U can be expressed as U = (1/2) ∫ D · E d³x. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the implications of time-dependent changes in D and E during the readjustment of the dielectric after adding free charge, questioning the validity of using the incremental change formula without accounting for these dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear dielectrics and their properties
  • Familiarity with electric displacement field (D) and electric field (E)
  • Knowledge of potential energy concepts in electrostatics
  • Basic calculus for integration in three dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy density in linear dielectrics using Maxwell's equations
  • Explore the effects of polarization on electric fields in dielectrics
  • Learn about the relationship between free charge and bound charge in dielectric materials
  • Investigate energy conservation principles in electrostatic systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those focusing on dielectric materials and energy density calculations.

dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
I've examined and re-examined the proof that the energy density of a linear dielectric is [itex]u=\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}[/itex], but I still don't understand it. I'll rewrite it here and try to explain what I'm having trouble grasping.

We first imagine that the free charge (as a function of position) changes by an amount [itex]\delta \rho_{\mathrm{free}}(\mathbf{x})[/itex]. The change in the potential energy [itex]\delta U[/itex] is then
[tex]\int \delta\rho_{\mathrm{free}}(\mathbf{x})V(\mathbf{x})\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}.[/tex]
This can be rewritten as
[tex]\int\nabla\cdot(\delta \mathbf{D}(\mathbf{x}))V(\mathbf{x})\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}=\int \nabla\cdot(\delta \mathbf{D} \ V)\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x} + \int \delta \mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}.[/tex]
The first term vanished because we're integrating over all of space. Also, if the dielectric is linear we have that [itex]\delta \mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E} =\frac{1}{2}\delta(\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E})[/itex]. Hence
[tex]\delta U = \frac{1}{2} \int \delta(\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E})\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x} \rightarrow U=\frac{1}{2}\int \mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x},[/tex]
proving the desired result.

My problem is with step 1. I'm imagining that time is frozen, and that we come along and sprinkle a little bit of free charge in the dielectric, like dust. Then potential energy changes by the amount [itex]\int \frac{1}{2} \delta (\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E})\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}[/itex]. So far so good. But if we start time up again, the whole system is going to change as the polarization and bound charges adjust to the introduction of this new free charge.

"But that's not a problem," you say. "During this readjustment, energy is still conserved, so the change in [itex]\delta U[/itex] is still given by that formula."

Fine, but here's the issue: after this readjustment, the change in [itex]\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}[/itex] is not the [itex]\delta(\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E})[/itex] that appears in the formula above. Why? Because during the readjustment, [itex]\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}[/itex] changes as well. That means that as we incrementally add free charge, we cannot conclude that the incremental change in energy is [itex]\int \frac{1}{2} \Delta (\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E})\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}[/itex] (where [itex]\Delta (\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E})[/itex] is the actual change in D dot E), because we haven't taken into account that [itex]\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}[/itex] changes from readjustment.

Also, if we want to calculate the change in energy when free charge is added, why don't we take into account the change in energy from the fact that the potential changes ie why don't we include a term like [itex]\delta U = \int \rho \delta V\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K