MHB What is the equation of a line passing through (6, -3) with a y-intercept of 8?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Find an equation of the line passing through (6, -3) and has y-intercept 8. Express final answer in the form y = mx + b.

If it has y-intercept 8, this means the point (0, 8).

I now have 2 points.

1. Find the slope

2. Use the point-slope formula

3. Solve for y

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A line passing through the point:

$$\left(x_1,y_1\right)$$

And having the $y$-intercept $b$, expressed in slope intercept form, will be:

$$y=\frac{y_1-b}{x_1}x+b$$
 
Is my information correct?
 
RTCNTC said:
Is my information correct?

Essentially, although I would change step 3 to read "Arrange in slope-intercept form." It's not enough to just solve for y, because we could have solved for y but not used the slope-intercept form, such as:

$$y=m(x-a)+b$$

We would want to arrange this as:

$$y=mx+(b-ma)$$
 
By solving for y I meant slope-intercept form y = mx + b.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top