MHB What Is the Equivalent Linear Spring Constant at Steady Deflection?

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
The force-deflection relation of a steel helical spring used in an engine is found experimentally as \(F(x) = 200x + 50x^2 + 10x^3\), where the force \((F)\) and deflection \((x)\) are measured in pounds and inches, respectively. If the spring undergoes a steady deflection of \(0.5\) in during the operation of the engine, determine the equivalent linear spring constant of the spring at its steady deflection.

If I knew \(F\), I could simply solve the cubic for the real \(x\) and then use the Newtons 2nd law \(F = k_{eq}x\).

In this problem, I don't have \(F\) instead I have the steady deflection. How do I solve this type of problem?

The answer is \(253.75\) lb per in
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
The force-deflection relation of a steel helical spring used in an engine is found experimentally as \(F(x) = 200x + 50x^2 + 10x^3\), where the force \((F)\) and deflection \((x)\) are measured in pounds and inches, respectively. If the spring undergoes a steady deflection of \(0.5\) in during the operation of the engine, determine the equivalent linear spring constant of the spring at its steady deflection.

If I knew \(F\), I could simply solve the cubic for the real \(x\) and then use the Newtons 2nd law \(F = k_{eq}x\).

In this problem, I don't have \(F\) instead I have the steady deflection. How do I solve this type of problem?

The answer is \(253.75\) lb per in
What do you mean by "steady deflection?" It sounds like the spring is at a particular point and doesn't move?

Also, F = kx is Hooke's Law, not Newton's.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
What do you mean by "steady deflection?" It sounds like the spring is at a particular point and doesn't move?

Also, F = kx is Hooke's Law, not Newton's.

-Dan

That is just the terminology the book uses.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top