What is the Expectation Value of Momentum for a Wave Function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of momentum for a given wave function expressed in terms of its amplitude and phase components. The context is set within an introductory modern physics course, where participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics without extensive background in eigenvalues or eigenvectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of the momentum operator to the wave function and question the validity of manipulating operators through functions. There is a discussion about the implications of the normalization condition and the potential outcomes of the expectation value calculation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct application of the momentum operator, while others express uncertainty about the simplification of the resulting expressions. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the mathematical steps involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of the participants' varying levels of familiarity with the underlying principles of quantum mechanics, which may affect their understanding of the problem. Additionally, the arbitrary nature of the functions involved in the wave function is noted as a factor in predicting the expectation value.

Feldoh
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Consider a wave function [tex]\psi (x,t) = R(x,t) exp(i S(x,t))[/tex] what is the expectation value of momentum?

Homework Equations


[tex]<f(x)> = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \psi^* f(x) \psi dx[/tex]

[tex]\hat{p} = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


This is for an intro to modern class so I don't really have a formal background with eigenvalues/vectors yet so this is a bit confusing.

Can I just say that [tex]<p> = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \psi^{*} \hat{p} \psi dx = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \hat{p} \psi^{*} \psi dx[/tex] ?

If so by the normalization condition <p> = -i hbar which I don't think can be the case.

So...

[tex]<p> = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} R exp(-i S) \hat{p} R exp(i S) dx[/tex]

[tex]= -i\hbar \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} R exp(-i S) * [R' exp(i S) + i R S' exp(i S)]dx[/tex]

[tex]= -i\hbar \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} R R' + i R^2 S' dx[/tex]

= ?

I don't really see anything from there...

I'm tempted to just say 0, but I'm not sure that the function being evaluated is odd.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Feldoh said:
Can I just say that [tex]<p> = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \psi^{*} \hat{p} \psi dx = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \hat{p} \psi^{*} \psi dx[/tex] ?

No, you cannot.
The first equality is true, but the second is not. You cannot just pull an operator through a function, because
[tex]\psi^* \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi \neq \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi^* \psi[/tex]
which is ambiguous too, as it could mean either
[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left( \psi^* \psi \right) = \frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial x} \psi + \psi^* \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}[/tex]
or
[tex]\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi^* \right) \psi[/tex]

Instead you just plug in the wave-function. Start by writing down what is
[tex]\hat p \psi(x, t)[/tex]
 
I all ready did apply the momentum operator like that in my derivation:

[tex]i\hbar [R' exp(i S) + i R S' exp(i S)][/tex]

I just assumed that the second expression was wrong and did it the (semi)correct way.
 
Ah, I see that now.
Yes you did it right.
The result isn't something very beautiful, but I suppose one would not expect that... after all the wave function depends on R and S, both of which are arbitrary functions on spacetime, so one cannot "predict" the expectation value on physical grounds.
 
Ah, all right I just had in my mind that it would come out to be something the come be simplified a bit more. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
692
Replies
3
Views
3K