What is the formula for finding the determinant of a 10x10 matrix?

Click For Summary
Finding the determinant of a 10x10 matrix is complex and typically involves methods like row reduction or cofactor expansion. While row reduction can simplify the process, it remains tedious for large matrices. An explicit formula for a 10x10 determinant would require numerous variables, making it impractical to compute by hand. Instead, using computational tools or programming languages is recommended for accuracy. Leibniz's formula provides a theoretical way to express the determinant but requires understanding of permutations and sign functions.
Zythyr
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I am trying to figure out the formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix. I was told to use row reducation method, but I am not really sure what it is. I never took Linear Algebra. Can someone please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's going to be quite tedious even if you were to row-reduce it before finding its determinant. Some special matrices have easy determinants, so maybe you could see if the matrix for which you are trying to evaluate the determinant has some property which allows you to compute its determinant easily.

EDIT: I see that you say you are trying to "figure out the formula". There's a recursive method for finding the determinants of an arbitrary nxn matrix. It's known as cofactor expansion.
 
Last edited:
I know that's not what you are asking for, but in the case of 10x10... go numerical.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Definitely go numerical. It's going to take a long time computing the determinant of that unless it was diagonal.
 
Umm I can't go numerical... I need to do it in terms of formulas... And no, diagonals arent allowed. What can I do? Can someone help me determine the forumla? please
 
Put the matrix in a list and use guassian elimination, and sounds like the perfect sort of problem for a functional programming language.
 
The explicit formula for such a matrix will be a horrible, horrible mess (think many many pages).

You are almost guarenteed to make an algebra error somewhere. This is exactly what computers are for.
 
  • #10
Zythyr said:
Umm I can't go numerical... I need to do it in terms of formulas... And no, diagonals arent allowed. What can I do? Can someone help me determine the forumla? please
Is this question from a textbook? If so, then perhaps it's best if you were to post the exact problem. The problem with devising a formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix is that it would require far too many variables, at least 100 variables would be needed, each for every entry of the matrix. I doubt any textbook problem would require such to be done.
 
  • #11
Defennder said:
Is this question from a textbook? If so, then perhaps it's best if you were to post the exact problem. The problem with devising a formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix is that it would require far too many variables, at least 100 variables would be needed, each for every entry of the matrix. I doubt any textbook problem would require such to be done.

Not in a textbook. My proffesor for Diffiq said if anyone figures out the forumal for the dertminant of a 10x10, they automatically get an A in the class.
 
  • #12
I'm pretty sure he meant that tongue-in-cheek. To clarify, did you ask him why he wanted only the formula for a 10x10 matrix and not some other arbitrary size?
 
  • #13
If you really want it [and don't want to derive it], you can write a short Maple program.

with(LinearAlgebra); M:=Matrix(3,3,symbol=m); Determinant(M);

You might wish gradually tune the size of the square matrix up to your desired value... but you should be prepared to wait.
 
  • #14
Finding the formula is really simple. You'd just need several pages to write/print it, and there would be 100 variables. So you'd be very likely to make a mistake somewhere if you tried to do it by hand.

I doubt that your professor would actually give an A for it though since it is extremely easy.

Hell, I wonder if this would suffice: (Let a_{i,j} denote the i,jth entry of the matrix)
\sum_{\sigma \in S_{10}} \text{sgn}(\sigma) \sum_{i=1}^{10} a_{i, \sigma(i)}
because that is one way to write the formula. It's called Leibniz's formula for the determinant. Of course you'd need to know what S_{10} is and what the sign of an element of S_{10} means as well as how to interpret the summation signs
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K