What is the function to extremise for finding geodesics on a Helicoid?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the function to extremise for geodesics on a helicoid, specifically the length of a curve on the surface represented by an integral. The function to extremise is identified as f(ρ, ρ') = √(1 + (4π²/h²)ρ² + (dρ/dz)²). There is confusion regarding how to express this in the form of a second derivative equation, as no second derivative appears in the function. It is suggested that the Euler equation should be used instead of the first-integral equation to derive the necessary form. The conversation concludes with clarification that differentiating the Beltrami identity can lead to the Euler-Lagrange form for one-dimensional problems.
jayzhao
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Given the Cartesian coordinates for a helicoid:

$$x=\rho cos\phi$$
$$y = \rho sin\phi$$
$$z=h\phi/2\pi$$

where ##\rho\in [0,\infty)##, ##\phi\in (-\infty,\infty)##, and h>0.

Set up the variational principle to search for geodesics on the helicoid. Use ##z## as the independent variable and ##\rho(z)## as the unknown function. Find the Euler equation for the ##\rho(z)## and rewrite it in the form

$$\frac{d^{2}\rho}{dz^{2}}=F(\rho,\rho')$$
Relevant Equations
Euler equations:

$$\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}-\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}\right)$$

For ##f(x,y(x),y'(x))##

When ##f(y(x),y'(x))## only:

$$f-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}y'=constant$$
I've got that length of a curve on the surface is:
$$L=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\sqrt{1+\frac{4\pi^{2}}{h^{2}}\rho^{2}+\left(\frac{d\rho}{dz}\right)^{2}}dx$$

So the function to extremise is:
$$f(\rho,\rho')=\sqrt{1+\frac{4\pi^{2}}{h^{2}}\rho^{2}+\left(\frac{d\rho}{dz}\right)^{2}}$$
Where ##\rho'=d\rho /dz##

But I don't know how to get this in the form
$$\frac{d^{2}\rho}{dz^{2}}=F(\rho,\rho')$$
since there doesn't seem to be a second derivative in the function anywhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jayzhao said:
Relevant Equations:: Euler equations:
$$\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}-\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}\right)$$When ##f(y(x),y'(x))## only:$$f-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}y'=constant$$

Maybe they want you to use the Euler equation ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}-\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}\right)## rather than the "first-integral" equation ##f-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}y'= \rm {const}##.
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
Maybe they want you to use the Euler equation ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}-\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}\right)## rather than the "first-integral" equation ##f-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}y'= \rm {const}##.
Thank you! I think you're right that's what they wanted. I was getting confused because I thought the first integral equation was a "special case" of the Euler equation but it turns out they're two different things.
 
You can always differentiate the Beltrami identity to recover the Euler-Lagrange form (as long as your problem is one-dimensional).
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PhDeezNutz
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top