What is the Gibbs sum for a system with two possible states and one particle?

Click For Summary
The Gibbs sum for a system with one particle in two states—one with zero energy and another with energy epsilon—is derived as z = 1 + λ + λ exp(-ε/τ). The thermal average occupancy of the system is expressed as <N> = (λ + λ exp(-ε/τ))/z, while the occupancy of the state at energy epsilon is given by <N(ε)> = λ exp(-ε/τ)/z. The average energy of the system can be calculated using <ε_s(N)> = (Σ ε_s(N) exp((Nμ - ε)/τ))/z. The discussion clarifies the distinction between <N> and <N(ε)>, emphasizing that <N> accounts for all particles, while <N(ε)> focuses specifically on those at energy epsilon.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
a) Consider a system that may be unoccupied with energy zero or iccuped by one particle in either of two states, one of zer oeenrgy and one of energy epsilon. Show taht the Gibbs sum for this system is

z = 1 + \lambda / \lambda\exp(-\epsilon/\tau)

b) Show that the thermal average occupancy of the ssytem is
&lt;N&gt; = \frac{\lambda + \lambda\exp(-\epsilon/\tau)}{z}

c) show that the thermal average occupancy of the state at eneryg = epsilon is
&lt;N(\epsilon)&gt; = \lambda\exp(-\epsilon/\tau)/z

d) Find an expression for the theram laverage eneryg of the system
e) Allow the possibility tat the orbital at 0 and at epslon may be occupied each by one particle at the same time, show that
z = 1 + \lambda + \lambda\exp(-\epsilon/\tau) + \lambda^2 \exp(-\epsilon/\tau) = (1+ \lambda) [1 + \lambda \exp(\epsilon/\tau)]


I will post my attempted solutions in a seaparate post.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Gibbs Sum or grand sum is given by

for this problem at least...
z = \sum_{N=0}^{1} \sum_{s(0)}^{s(1)}} \exp\left(\frac{N\mu-\epsilon_{s(N)}}{\tau}\right)

which comes out to

z = \sum_{N=0}^{1} \exp(\frac{N\mu}{\tau}) + \exp\left(\frac{N\mu-\epsilon_{s(N)}}{\tau}\right)

whic his

z = \exp(0) + \exp(\frac{\mu}{\tau}) + \exp(\frac{\mu-\epsilon}{\tau}
a term is missing because there is NO energy contribution by the s(0) state.

also we defined lambda like \lambda = \exp(\mu/\tau}

so
z = 1 + \lambda + \lambda \exp(\epsilon/\tau)

for b) similar concept applies

c) What is the diff between <N> and <N(epsilon)>?? Is N(epsilon)_ the number of particles whose energy actually contributes??

d) &lt;\epsilon_{s(N)}&gt; = \frac{\sum_{N=0}^{1} \sum_{s(0)}^{s(1)} \epsilon_{s(N)} \exp((N\mu-\epsilon)/\tau)) }{z}

&lt;\epsilon_{s(N)}&gt; = \sum_{N=0}^{1} \frac{\epsilon_{s(N)}\exp(\frac{N\mu-\epsilon}{\tau})}{z}

&lt;\epsilon_{s(N)}&gt; = \exp(\frac{\mu-\epsilon}{\tau})}{z} = \lambda\exp(-\epsilon/\tau)

e) i Dont quite understand

are they saying that we should accommodate N=1 only?? And N=0 is no more valid
 
Last edited:
c) <N> is the average number of particles in the system, all energies included. <N(epsilon)> is the average number of particles with the particular energy epsilon in the system.
 
d) The possible combinations are N=0, E=0; N=1, E=0; N=1, E=epsilon. You are on the right track in your first two attempts, so I think you should be able to figure it out from here.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K