What is the Hamiltonian for a bead on a rotating rod with fixed z and R?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gluon1988
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bead of mass m on a frictionless rod that spins with constant angular velocity about a vertical axis. The task is to find the Hamiltonian for the bead and to demonstrate that it does not equal the sum of kinetic and potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the Hamiltonian and expresses confusion regarding the kinetic energy calculation, particularly with the fixed z and R. Some participants question the assumption that z remains constant and discuss the implications of the system being conservative.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the conditions under which the Hamiltonian may not equal T + U. There is acknowledgment of the need for additional terms in the kinetic energy expression, and some clarification on the nature of the coordinate transformations is being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the problem being categorized in an easier section of the text, which may influence expectations regarding the complexity of the variables involved, particularly concerning the z-coordinate.

gluon1988
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bead of mass, [tex]m[/tex] is threaded on a frictionless, straight rod, which lies in the horizontal plane and is forced to spin with constant angular velocity, [tex]\omega[/tex], about a fixed vertical axis through the midpoint of the rod. Find the Hamiltonian for the bead and show that it does not equal [tex]T+U[/tex]

Homework Equations



[tex]\mathcal{L}=T-U[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\dot{q}}=\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial{q}}[/tex]

[tex]p=\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\dot{q}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathcal{H}=\sum p_{i}\dot{q}_{i}-\mathcal{L}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



The bead is threaded onto the road, so the radius is fixed. So is the z-axis. The only degree of freedom for the bead is [tex]\phi[/tex], the angle it is located at in reference to a starting point.

[tex]\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{\phi} R)^{2}-U(\phi)[/tex]

[tex]p=\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\dot{\phi}}=m{R^2}{\dot{\phi}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathcal{H}=m{R^2}{{\dot{\phi}}^2}-\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{\phi} R)^{2}-U(\phi)=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{\phi} R)^{2}+U(\phi)\rightarrow\mathcal{H}=T+U[/tex]??

I'm assuming I am getting the kinetic energy wrong but I really don't see what it could be with z and R fixed. Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Huh, I don't see any physical reason why H≠T+U. The two conditions seem to be met: the system is conservative (potential energy is velocity independent), and the equations of transformation connecting the rectangular and generalized coordinates are independent of time.

While it doesn't change the two points I listed above, why are you saying that z does not change? Seems to me like z is able to change.
 
Mindscrape said:
Huh, I don't see any physical reason why H≠T+U. The two conditions seem to be met: the system is conservative (potential energy is velocity independent), and the equations of transformation connecting the rectangular and generalized coordinates are independent of time.

While it doesn't change the two points I listed above, why are you saying that z does not change? Seems to me like z is able to change.

The problem just stated that H≠T+U. I think they were trying to show that not every form of general coordinates will work for non-inertial frames. Regardless, I was missing a term of [tex]{{\omega}^2}{sin}^{2}(\phi){\phi}^2[/tex] in the kinetic energy term, which does in fact lead to H≠T+U.

The problem was listed on the easier section of the text, so I assumed they weren't going to vary z, which they didn't thankfully.

Thanks for the reply
 
Oh, I see now what the problem was describing. It's written in the usual cryptic, non-explicit description that classical mechanics problems tend to have.

The equations of transformation connecting the rectangular and generalized coordinates are not independent of time after all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K