What is the Hamiltonian operator for a spin 1/2 particle in a magnetic field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hamiltonian operator for a spin 1/2 particle in a magnetic field is derived using the formula H = -γB₀Sₓ, where B₀ is the magnetic field vector and Sₓ is the spin operator represented by the Pauli matrices. The specific Hamiltonian matrix in the {| + >, | - >} basis is H = B₀ħ \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc} \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}} \\ \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}} & -\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}} \\ \end{array} \right)\]. Eigenvalues calculated from this matrix yield ±√2, with corresponding eigenvectors obtained using MATLAB. The time evolution of the state | - > is expressed as a superposition of the eigenstates, leading to probabilities for energy measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin 1/2 systems.
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian operators and their significance in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Pauli matrices and their application in quantum state representation.
  • Experience with eigenvalue problems and matrix algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Hamiltonians for different quantum systems.
  • Learn about the time evolution operator in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the use of MATLAB for solving quantum mechanical problems.
  • Investigate the implications of measurement in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to probabilities.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists working with spin systems, and anyone interested in the mathematical formulation of quantum states and their evolution in magnetic fields.

ultimateguy
Messages
122
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a spin 1/2 particle placed in a magnetic field \vec{B_0} with components:

B_x = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} B_0
B_y = 0
B_z = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} B_0

a) Calculate the matrix representing, in the {| + >, | - >} basis, the operator H, the Hamiltonian of the system.
b) Calculate the eigenvalues and the eigenvectors of H.
c) The system at time t = 0 is in the state | - >. What values can be found if the energy is measured, and with what probabilities?


Homework Equations


\omega_0 = - \gamma B_0
H = \omega_0 S_z
S_z = \frac{\hbar}{2} \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1 \\ \end{array} \right)\]

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm stuck on part a).

My initial instinct is to do this:

H = \omega_0 S_z
H = - \gamma \vec{B_0} S_z
H = - \gamma \vec{B_0} \frac{\hbar}{2} \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1 \\ \end{array} \right)\]

But \vec{B_0} is a 3D column vector, and I can't multiply that into a 2x2 matrix. And I have to somehow express that with | + > and | - >... I have a feeling I'm on the wrong track.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The basical hamiltonian is on the form:

H = \vec{B} \cdot \vec{S} = B_x \cdot S_x + B_y \cdot S_y + B_z \cdot S_z

And the S_x = \frac{1}{2} \sigma _x pauli matrix, etc

(I use natural units, so don't bother)¨

I hope my hint helped you anyway to solve a)
 
Last edited:
So with this I get:

H = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} B_0 \frac{\hbar}{2} \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\ \end{array} \right)\]
+ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} B_0 \frac{\hbar}{2} \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1 \\ \end{array} \right)\]

H = B_0 \hbar \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}} &amp; \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}} \\<br /> \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}} &amp; \frac{-1}{2\sqrt{2}} \\ \end{array} \right)\]

Right?
 
Yes, that looks correct. Now find eigenvalue and eigenvector of this matrix.
 
For the eigenvalue:

(\frac{B_0 \hbar}{2\sqrt2})^2 (1-\lambda)(1-\lambda) - (\frac{B_0 \hbar}{2\sqrt2})^2 = 0

(1-\lambda)(1-\lambda) = 0
\lambda = 1

And the eigenvector:

\frac{B_0 \hbar} {2\sqrt2} \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; -2 \\ \end{array} \right)\] \times \[ \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> c_1 \\<br /> c_2 \\ \end{array} \right)\] = 0

This gives me c_2 = 0 and c_1 = \frac{B_0 \hbar} {2\sqrt2}. I think I did something wrong.
 
for matrix:

A = \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc} a &amp; a\\ a &amp; -a \\ \end{array} \right)\]

The secular eq is (a- \lambda )(-a- \lambda ) - a^2 = 0

if lambda is the eigenvalue.
 
Thanks, I found the problem, I should have had (1-\lambda)(-1-\lambda) = 1
 
Ok so I get the following system of equations for the case of the eigenvalue +\sqrt2

(1-\sqrt2)c_1 + c_2 = 0
c_1 + (-1-\sqrt2)c_2 = 0

which according to myself and my calculator has no solution...
 
If you can get eigenvalues to a matrix, then there exists corresponding eigenvectors.

Eigen vectors are, by using Matlab:

for sqrt2 = (-0.92388,-0.38268)
for -sqrt2 = (0.38268,-0.92388)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Ok I found the two eigenvectors using Matlab. I'm not sure how to write them when applied to the system so that it makes sense.

|\psi(t)&gt; = 0.92388 | + &gt; + 0.382683 | - &gt;
|\psi(t)&gt; = 0.382683 | + &gt; - 0.92388 | - &gt;

Is this correct? And for part c), which one do I use to find the probability?
 
  • #11
But in order to get them analytically, just do substituion
c_1 = (1+\sqrt2)c_2
From your second equation and put in into the first one and solve for c_2

Now how does a state evolve with time? Ever heard of "Time evolution operator" or similar?

Time evolution of a ket is
|a(t) \rangle = \exp (-i E_a t/\hbar)|a(0) \rangle
where E_a is the energy eigenvalue of that ket.

So your egeinvectors are:
|\psi +&gt; = 0.92388 | + &gt; + 0.382683 | - &gt;
|\psi -&gt; = 0.382683 | + &gt; - 0.92388 | - &gt;

Dont use time, as you did, it is not correct.
The psi + has eigenvalue +sqrt2 etc.
Now I have helped you very much.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Yes I've seen it. So the eigenvectors are just for |\psi(0)&gt; ?
 
  • #13
no, just for the hamiltonian.

at time = 0; the state is in |->

Then you must find out what just |-> is in superposition of the eigenvectors to the hamiltonian, in order to get the time evolution.

i.e you should first write |-> = a|phi + > + b|phi ->
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K