What is the Helmholtz Decomposition of a Vector Field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Helmholtz Decomposition states that any vector field H can be expressed as the sum of an irrotational function F and a solenoidal function G. In this discussion, the vector field H(r) = x²yi + y²zj + z²xk is analyzed, leading to the equations F = -∇Ψ and G = ∇×A. The divergence of H was calculated, resulting in the equation ∇²Ψ = -2xy - 2yz - 2zx. A proposed solution for Ψ is -xyz(x+y+z), which effectively decomposes H into its components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically divergence and curl operations.
  • Familiarity with Helmholtz's theorem and its implications in vector field analysis.
  • Knowledge of Laplace's equation and methods for solving it.
  • Experience with irrotational and solenoidal vector fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Helmholtz's theorem in vector calculus.
  • Learn techniques for solving Laplace's equation in three dimensions.
  • Explore methods for finding irrotational and solenoidal components of vector fields.
  • Investigate the properties of curl and divergence in the context of fluid dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector fields and require a deeper understanding of the Helmholtz Decomposition and its applications.

Zebrostrich
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let H(r) = x^{2}yi + y^{2}zj + z^{2}xk. Find an irrotational function F(r) and a solenoidal function G(r) such that H(r) = F(r) + G(r)

Homework Equations



From Helmholtz's theorem, any vector field H can be expressed as:

H = -\nabla\Psi + \nablaxA

So then:

F = -\nabla\Psi

and G = \nablaxA

The Attempt at a Solution



Taking the divergence of H(r) = F(r) + G(r), I obtained (since the Divergence of G is zero)

\nabla^{2}\Psi = - 2xy - 2yz - 2zx

I really have no idea how to solve this equation. If I took the curl, I would have an even more complicated system. I found out a solution to this equation, but merely by guessing. That would be \Psi = -xyz(x+y+z), and from there I found the two vector fields. However, that does not seem sufficient enough. Is there a better way to approach this problem that I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think so. If you can guess a solution to Laplace's equation, which you did, you are way ahead of the game. I think that's the way you were intended to solve it. The problem was rigged that way. Great job.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K