What is the Hypergeometric Challenge #2?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of hypergeometric functions, specifically the challenge of proving certain identities involving the hypergeometric function ${}_2F_1$. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and technical exploration of integral representations and transformations related to hypergeometric functions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Post 1 presents a specific identity involving ${}_2F_1 \left(a,1-a;c; \frac{1}{2} \right)$ and provides a formula to prove it.
  • Post 2 details a derivation using Euler's integral representation of the hypergeometric function, leading to a complex expression involving gamma functions.
  • Post 3 acknowledges the difficulty of using the duplication formula in the derivation process, indicating a shared challenge among participants.
  • Post 4 introduces another identity related to Gauss' second summation theorem, suggesting a different approach using Euler's integral representation.
  • Post 5 proposes using a combination of Euler transformation and Kummer's equation, expressing concern over the complexity of starting from scratch.
  • Post 6 inquires about the Mellin transform of the Gauss hypergeometric function, indicating interest in further mathematical exploration.
  • Post 7 discusses Ramanujan's master formula for evaluating Mellin transforms of hypergeometric functions, providing a detailed expression for the evaluation.
  • Post 8 expresses appreciation for Ramanujan's contributions to the field, acknowledging the significance of his theorem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various approaches and techniques for evaluating hypergeometric functions, but there is no consensus on a single method or resolution of the challenges presented. Multiple competing views and methods remain in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes complex mathematical expressions and transformations that may depend on specific conditions or definitions, which are not fully resolved within the thread.

alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
Prove the following

$$_2F_1 \left(a,1-a;c; \frac{1}{2} \right) = \frac{\Gamma \left(\frac{c}{2} \right)\Gamma \left(\frac{1+c}{2} \right) } {\Gamma \left(\frac{c+a}{2}\right)\Gamma \left(\frac{1+c-a}{2}\right)}.$$​
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This only took me a couple of hours to figure out.(Whew)Using Euler's integral representation of ${}_2F_{1}(a,b;c;z)$,

$$\displaystyle {}_2F_{1} \left(a,1-a;c;\frac{1}{2} \right) = \frac{\Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(1-a) \Gamma(a+c-1)} \int_{0}^{1} t^{-a} (1-t)^{a+c-2} \left(1- \frac{t}{2} \right)^{-a} \ dt$$

$$ = \frac{\Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(1-a) \Gamma(a+c-1)} \int_{0}^{1} (1-u)^{-a} u^{a+c-2} \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{u}{2} \right)^{-a} \ du$$

$$ = \frac{2^{a} \ \Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(1-a) \Gamma(a+c-1)} \int_{0}^{1} u^{a+c-2} (1-u^{2})^{-a} \ du $$

$$ = \frac{2^{a-1} \ \Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(1-a) \Gamma(a+c-1)} \int_{0}^{1} w^{\frac{a}{2} + \frac{c}{2} -\frac{3}{2}} (1-w)^{-a} \ dw$$

$$= \frac{2^{a-1} \ \Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(1-a) \Gamma(c+a-1)} \frac{\Gamma(\frac{a}{2} + \frac{c}{2}- \frac{1}{2}) \Gamma(1-a)}{\Gamma(\frac{c}{2}- \frac{a}{2}+ \frac{1}{2})} = \frac{2^{a-1} \ \Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(a+c-1)} \frac{\Gamma(\frac{a}{2} + \frac{c}{2}- \frac{1}{2}) }{\Gamma(\frac{c}{2}- \frac{a}{2}+ \frac{1}{2})}$$

$$ = \frac{2^{a-1} \ \Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(a+c-1)} \frac{\Gamma\big(\frac{1}{2} (a + c- 1)\big)}{\Gamma(\frac{c}{2}- \frac{a}{2}+ \frac{1}{2}) } $$

And using the duplication formula twice,

$$ = 2^{a-1} \frac{2^{c-1} \Gamma(\frac{c}{2}) \Gamma (\frac{c}{2}+ \frac{1}{2})}{\sqrt{\pi}} \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2^{a+c-2}\Gamma(\frac{a}{2} + \frac{c}{2})} \frac{1}{\Gamma(\frac{c}{2} - \frac{a}{2} + \frac{1}{2})}$$

$$ = \frac{\Gamma(\frac{c}{2}) \Gamma(\frac{c}{2} + \frac{1}{2})}{\Gamma(\frac{a}{2} + \frac{c}{2}) \Gamma(\frac{c}{2} - \frac{a}{2} + \frac{1}{2})}$$
 
Hey Greg , I am pleased to have you back . Using the duplication formula was the tricky part and using it twice is surely tiresome !
 
What seems even more tricky is to use Euler's integral representation to show that $$ \displaystyle _{2}F_{1}\left( a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2},\frac{1}{2} \right) = \frac{\sqrt{\pi} \ \Gamma (\frac{a+b+1}{2})}{\Gamma(\frac{a+1}{2}) \Gamma (\frac{b+1}{2})}$$

Wikipedia refers to this as Gauss' second summation theorem.
 
I would use a combination of euler transformation and kummer equation . Staring from scratch is sureley cumbersome!
 
By the way greg have you worked th mellin transform of the gauss hypergeometric function ,it is quite interesting.
See here
 
You can use Ramanujan's master formula to evaluate the Mellin transform of $$ {}_pF_{q} (a_{1},a_{2}, \ldots, a_{p};b_{1},b_{2}, \ldots, b_{q}; -x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{\Gamma(a_{1}+k) \Gamma(a_{2}+k) \cdots \Gamma(a_{p}+k) \Gamma(b_{1}) \Gamma(b_{2}) \cdots \Gamma(b_{q})}{\Gamma(a_{1}) \Gamma(a_{2}) \cdots \Gamma(a_{p}) \Gamma (b_{1}+k) \Gamma(b_{2}+k) \cdots \Gamma(b_{q}+k)} \frac{(-x)^{k}}{k!}$$

Specifically, $$ \int_{0}^{\infty} x^{s-1} {}_pF_{q} (a_{1},a_{2}, \ldots, a_{p};b_{1},b_{2}, \ldots, b_{q}; -x) \ dx = \Gamma(s) \ \frac{\Gamma(a_{1}-s) \Gamma(a_{2}-s) \cdots \Gamma(a_{p}-s) \Gamma(b_{1}) \Gamma(b_{2}) \cdots \Gamma(b_{q})}{\Gamma(a_{1}) \Gamma(a_{2}) \cdots \Gamma(a_{p}) \Gamma (b_{1}-s) \Gamma(b_{2}-s) \cdots \Gamma(b_{q}-s)}$$

I've used the formula to evaluate the Mellin transforms of functions with simple hypergeometric representations of that form.
 
Yes , quite remarkable theorem , thanks to Ramnujan .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K