What is the Hypergeometric Challenge #2?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the hypergeometric identity involving the function ${}_2F_1(a, 1-a; c; \frac{1}{2})$ and its equivalence to a product of gamma functions. The proof utilizes Euler's integral representation of the hypergeometric function and the duplication formula for gamma functions. Participants highlight the complexity of the proof and discuss related concepts such as Gauss' second summation theorem and the Mellin transform of hypergeometric functions, referencing Ramanujan's master formula for evaluation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hypergeometric functions, specifically ${}_2F_1$.
  • Familiarity with gamma functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of Euler's integral representation of hypergeometric functions.
  • Experience with the duplication formula for gamma functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Gauss' second summation theorem.
  • Learn about the Mellin transform and its applications to hypergeometric functions.
  • Explore Ramanujan's master theorem and its implications in mathematical analysis.
  • Investigate the Kummer equation and its relationship with hypergeometric functions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in mathematical analysis, and students studying special functions, particularly those interested in hypergeometric functions and their applications in various fields.

alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
Prove the following

$$_2F_1 \left(a,1-a;c; \frac{1}{2} \right) = \frac{\Gamma \left(\frac{c}{2} \right)\Gamma \left(\frac{1+c}{2} \right) } {\Gamma \left(\frac{c+a}{2}\right)\Gamma \left(\frac{1+c-a}{2}\right)}.$$​
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This only took me a couple of hours to figure out.(Whew)Using Euler's integral representation of ${}_2F_{1}(a,b;c;z)$,

$$\displaystyle {}_2F_{1} \left(a,1-a;c;\frac{1}{2} \right) = \frac{\Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(1-a) \Gamma(a+c-1)} \int_{0}^{1} t^{-a} (1-t)^{a+c-2} \left(1- \frac{t}{2} \right)^{-a} \ dt$$

$$ = \frac{\Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(1-a) \Gamma(a+c-1)} \int_{0}^{1} (1-u)^{-a} u^{a+c-2} \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{u}{2} \right)^{-a} \ du$$

$$ = \frac{2^{a} \ \Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(1-a) \Gamma(a+c-1)} \int_{0}^{1} u^{a+c-2} (1-u^{2})^{-a} \ du $$

$$ = \frac{2^{a-1} \ \Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(1-a) \Gamma(a+c-1)} \int_{0}^{1} w^{\frac{a}{2} + \frac{c}{2} -\frac{3}{2}} (1-w)^{-a} \ dw$$

$$= \frac{2^{a-1} \ \Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(1-a) \Gamma(c+a-1)} \frac{\Gamma(\frac{a}{2} + \frac{c}{2}- \frac{1}{2}) \Gamma(1-a)}{\Gamma(\frac{c}{2}- \frac{a}{2}+ \frac{1}{2})} = \frac{2^{a-1} \ \Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(a+c-1)} \frac{\Gamma(\frac{a}{2} + \frac{c}{2}- \frac{1}{2}) }{\Gamma(\frac{c}{2}- \frac{a}{2}+ \frac{1}{2})}$$

$$ = \frac{2^{a-1} \ \Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(a+c-1)} \frac{\Gamma\big(\frac{1}{2} (a + c- 1)\big)}{\Gamma(\frac{c}{2}- \frac{a}{2}+ \frac{1}{2}) } $$

And using the duplication formula twice,

$$ = 2^{a-1} \frac{2^{c-1} \Gamma(\frac{c}{2}) \Gamma (\frac{c}{2}+ \frac{1}{2})}{\sqrt{\pi}} \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2^{a+c-2}\Gamma(\frac{a}{2} + \frac{c}{2})} \frac{1}{\Gamma(\frac{c}{2} - \frac{a}{2} + \frac{1}{2})}$$

$$ = \frac{\Gamma(\frac{c}{2}) \Gamma(\frac{c}{2} + \frac{1}{2})}{\Gamma(\frac{a}{2} + \frac{c}{2}) \Gamma(\frac{c}{2} - \frac{a}{2} + \frac{1}{2})}$$
 
Hey Greg , I am pleased to have you back . Using the duplication formula was the tricky part and using it twice is surely tiresome !
 
What seems even more tricky is to use Euler's integral representation to show that $$ \displaystyle _{2}F_{1}\left( a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2},\frac{1}{2} \right) = \frac{\sqrt{\pi} \ \Gamma (\frac{a+b+1}{2})}{\Gamma(\frac{a+1}{2}) \Gamma (\frac{b+1}{2})}$$

Wikipedia refers to this as Gauss' second summation theorem.
 
I would use a combination of euler transformation and kummer equation . Staring from scratch is sureley cumbersome!
 
By the way greg have you worked th mellin transform of the gauss hypergeometric function ,it is quite interesting.
See here
 
You can use Ramanujan's master formula to evaluate the Mellin transform of $$ {}_pF_{q} (a_{1},a_{2}, \ldots, a_{p};b_{1},b_{2}, \ldots, b_{q}; -x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{\Gamma(a_{1}+k) \Gamma(a_{2}+k) \cdots \Gamma(a_{p}+k) \Gamma(b_{1}) \Gamma(b_{2}) \cdots \Gamma(b_{q})}{\Gamma(a_{1}) \Gamma(a_{2}) \cdots \Gamma(a_{p}) \Gamma (b_{1}+k) \Gamma(b_{2}+k) \cdots \Gamma(b_{q}+k)} \frac{(-x)^{k}}{k!}$$

Specifically, $$ \int_{0}^{\infty} x^{s-1} {}_pF_{q} (a_{1},a_{2}, \ldots, a_{p};b_{1},b_{2}, \ldots, b_{q}; -x) \ dx = \Gamma(s) \ \frac{\Gamma(a_{1}-s) \Gamma(a_{2}-s) \cdots \Gamma(a_{p}-s) \Gamma(b_{1}) \Gamma(b_{2}) \cdots \Gamma(b_{q})}{\Gamma(a_{1}) \Gamma(a_{2}) \cdots \Gamma(a_{p}) \Gamma (b_{1}-s) \Gamma(b_{2}-s) \cdots \Gamma(b_{q}-s)}$$

I've used the formula to evaluate the Mellin transforms of functions with simple hypergeometric representations of that form.
 
Yes , quite remarkable theorem , thanks to Ramnujan .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K