What is the Induction Process for Finding det(alpha*A)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the induction process for calculating the determinant of the matrix product det(α*A). The user seeks clarification on substituting det(α*A_{ij}) with α^n det(A_{ij}) and how to derive the term α^(n+1) in the context of matrix determinants. It is established that det(α*A_{ij}) represents k x k matrices derived from (k+1)x(k+1) matrices by removing the ij row and column. The user emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the elements of the matrix as α*a_ij.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix determinants and properties
  • Familiarity with induction proofs in mathematics
  • Knowledge of matrix notation and operations
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants, specifically for scalar multiplication
  • Learn about induction techniques in mathematical proofs
  • Explore the relationship between matrix elements and their determinants
  • Investigate the implications of removing rows and columns in determinant calculations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and anyone interested in understanding the induction process for determinants in matrix theory.

DMOC
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Old topic: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=194725

I have a question that's the same as the one in the old topic/thread I linked to above. At the last post, I am trying to figure out how to carry out the induction process.

[itex]\sum_{j=1}^n (-1)^{i+j} a_{ij} det(\alpha A_{ij})[/itex]

I understand that all [itex]det(\alpha A_{ij})[/itex] will be k x k matrices because they are basically (k+1)x(k+1) matrices but without the ij row/column so those matrices will fall under the range of induction, i.e. between 2 and k, inclusive.

But if I substitute [itex]det(\alpha A_{ij})[/itex] with [itex]\alpha^n det(A_{ij})[/itex] I will get [itex]\sum_{j=1}^n (-1)^{i+j} a_{ij} \alpha^ndet(A_{ij})[/itex]

Where do I get the extra n so that it becomes alpha ^ n + 1. (Note: when I write out the actual proof, I'll use alpha^(k+1) instead of n + 1)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


a_ij is supposed to be the ijth element of the matrix alpha*A, not A. You are trying to find det(alpha*A). It should be alpha*a_ij.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K