What is the Initial Angular Acceleration of a Pivoted Rod with Hanging Masses?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the initial angular acceleration of a pivoted rod with two hanging masses. The problem involves concepts from rotational dynamics, specifically the application of torque and rotational inertia.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of different formulas for rotational inertia and question the necessity of including the mass of the rod. There is discussion on calculating torque based on the forces exerted by the hanging masses and their distances from the pivot.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, calculating rotational inertia and torque, and discussing the signs of the torques involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of net torque and the need to consider the direction of forces.

Contextual Notes

The mass of the rod is not provided, leading to questions about its impact on the calculations. Participants are also considering the implications of different conventions for torque direction.

chowyo123
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A rod of length 2.4 m is pivoted at its center and masses of 2.3 kg and 3.1 kg are hung from its two ends. Find the initial angular acceleration of the rod when the system is released from a starting position of the rod that is horizontal.

The radius of the rod would be r=1/2(2.4).. which is 1.2.

Should I use the equation I=mr^2 or I=1/12ml^2? I=mr^2 is I=(2.3)(1.2)^2=3.312 and I=(3.1)(1.2)^2=4.464. I=1/12ml^2 is I=1/12(2.3)(2.4)^2=1.104 and I=1/12(3.1)(2.4)^2=1.488. Do i even need these for this problem?

Where do i go next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Newton's 2nd law for rotational motion: [tex]\tau = I \alpha[/tex], where I is the total rotational inertia.

What's the mass of the rod?
 
I=(2.3)(1.2)^2= 3.312
I=(3.1)(1.2)^2= 4.464

3.312+4.464= 7.776. = I..

is this right so far?
 
Is the rod assumed to be massless? It looks like you are on the right track, and now find the torque. I'd suggest, this time, doing all the algebra before you put in the numbers.
 
The problem doesn't state the mass of the rod, just the masses on both ends.
How do i find the torque if I've only got the inertia?
 
The torque is caused by the weight of the hanging masses. Use the usual formula for finding torque.
 
Yeah, the usual formula of [tex]\tau_\textit{net} = FR_1 + FR_2[/tex] where the force would be the force of gravity and r the distance from the pivot to the perpindicular force (half the length of the rod).
 
Last edited:
so Tnet = (9.8 x 2.3)(1.2)+(9.8 x 3.1)(1.2)?

Tnet=F(m*a)R1+F(m*a)R2?
 
Last edited:
One torque is clockwise; one counter-clockwise. They have different signs.
 
  • #10
so [tex]\tau_\textit{net} = FR_1 + FR_2[/tex] was not right?
 
  • #11
chowyo123 said:
so [tex]\tau_\textit{net} = FR_1 + FR_2[/tex] was not right?

Yes, but you need to change the signs:

[tex]\tau_\textit{net} = F_1R_1 - F_2R_2[/tex]

You have to subtract the torque caused by the lesser mass because it works in the opposite direction (like Doc said).

I added the subscripts to F because they're two different forces.
 
  • #12
So:
Tnet = (9.8 x 3.1)(1.2)-(9.8 x 2.3)(1.2)= 9.408? What's next?

[tex]\tau = I \alpha[/tex]

[tex]\ 9.408=7.776\alpha[/tex] ??
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Well, yeah, it was plus a negative torque, which you could just write as minus.

Yes, that should give the right answer when you divide.
 
  • #14
angular acceleration= 1.2 rad/s^2
 
  • #15
Yeah, depending on what convention they wanted you to use for positive or negative torque then the sign will be different. But, it doesn't look like they ever told you what weight was on which end, so you are probably fine.
 
  • #16
ok, thanks for the help, I appreciate it much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K