What is the Internal Resistance of the Battery in this Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gbox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the internal resistance of a battery in a circuit with two voltmeters and three ammeters. The circuit analysis employs Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL), along with Thevenin's and Norton's theorems, although the latter were deemed unnecessary by some participants. Key equations derived include relationships between currents and resistances, particularly focusing on the implications of zero current readings in ammeters A2 and A3, which indicate equal potential at their junctions. The analysis concludes that the resistors in each branch must maintain a specific ratio, directly influencing the internal resistance of the battery.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Knowledge of Thevenin's and Norton's theorems
  • Basic concepts of circuit analysis and resistor networks
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Thevenin's theorem in circuit simplification
  • Learn about voltage dividers and their role in circuit analysis
  • Explore advanced techniques for analyzing complex resistor networks
  • Investigate the impact of internal resistance on battery performance
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in battery technology or circuit analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Gbox
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The two voltmeters have very large resistance, the 3 ampere meter have resistance of ##0.5\Omega## each one.
##V_1## show twice as much voltage as ##V_2##, ##A_1## shows ##0.4A## and ##A_2=A_3=0A##

a. Find ##R_2##
b. Find the internal resistance of the battery

6XJIiIn.jpg

Homework Equations


KVL and KCL
Thevenin and Norton
Pi-T

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I did not saw a reason to use Thevenin or Norton, because ##A_2=A_3=0A## I can look at the circuit like this:

JD98F0M.jpg


And to start with KVL and KCL:

1) ##0.4=I_2+I_3##
2) ##1.6-0.4r-R_1*I_2-5I_2-R_2*I_2=0##
3) ##1.6-0.4r-2I_3-2.5I_3-R_3*I_3=0##
4) ##2V_2=V1\rightarrow 1.6-0.4r=5I_3##
5) ##A_2=0A## so there is also not voltage so ##R_1*I_2+2*I_3=0##
6)##A_3=0A## so there is also not voltage so ##R_2*I_2+R_3*I_3=0##

But I am left with unknowns
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ω Did you use the 2.5 Ω and the 5 Ω ? if there is no current in A2 and A3, what does that say about the currents through those two knowns ?
 
I used ##2.5 \Omega## in equation 3 and ##5 \Omega## in equation 2.

If there is no current, there is no voltage, I used this in equations 5 and 6
 
You can do some more sleuthing before you start writing loop equations. As you have deduced, the zero amp readings of the ammeters A2 and A3 tell you that the potentials at the corresponding junctions of the resistor branches must be the same. That is, the two resistor branches split the potential difference across the branch in the same way in both branches. That should tell you something about the relationship between corresponding resistors in each branch (think ratios and scaling).

Further, the fact that the potential across the middle resistors is half that of V1 tells you something else about the resistors in each branch. Look at what V1 is measuring.
 
Gbox said:
If there is no current, there is no voltage, I used this in equations 5 and 6
Gbox said:
5) A2=0AA_2=0A so there is also not voltage so R1∗I2+2∗I3=0R_1*I_2+2*I_3=0
6)A3=0AA_3=0A so there is also not voltage so R2∗I2+R3∗I3=0R_2*I_2+R_3*I_3=0
You have sign errors in those.

It appears that you're going about this in an overly complicated fashion.

If no current passes through A2 or A3, then how do the voltage drops across the 5Ω and 2.5Ω resistors compare?

You should be able to express the current through the 2.5Ω resistor (I3) in terms of V2 .
 
gneill said:
You can do some more sleuthing before you start writing loop equations. As you have deduced, the zero amp readings of the ammeters A2 and A3 tell you that the potentials at the corresponding junctions of the resistor branches must be the same. That is, the two resistor branches split the potential difference across the branch in the same way in both branches. That should tell you something about the relationship between corresponding resistors in each branch (think ratios and scaling).

Further, the fact that the potential across the middle resistors is half that of V1 tells you something else about the resistors in each branch. Look at what V1 is measuring.
So I can say that ##0.4A*\frac{R_1}{R_1+2}##?

As for the voltmeter I can say that ##2*I_3+2*2.5*I_3+R_3*I_3=1.6-0.4r##?
 
Gbox said:
So I can say that ##0.4A*\frac{R_1}{R_1+2}##?
That's not an equation...
As for the voltmeter I can say that ##2*I_3+2*2.5*I_3+R_3*I_3=1.6-0.4r##?
No equations yet! What is the voltmeter V1 across? It reads the branch voltage for ALL branches, right? They are parallel branches.

Back to the resistors:
If both branches divide the branch voltage in the same way, then all the resistor ratios in one branch must be duplicated in the other. For example, in the bottom branch the first two resistors have ratio 2/2.5. Then the middle branch's first two resistors must have the same ratio. So R1/5 = 2/2.5. What's R1? In fact, the resistors in one branch must be related to the corresponding resistors in the other branch by a single scaling factor (what is it?).

Note that V1 is the whole branch voltage, and the middle resistor of each branch is said to drop half of it. What does that tell you about the the rest of the resistance in each branch? (Hint: Remember how a voltage divider works).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
9K