What is the Latest Adventure of FranzBear and Uncle Artman?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yourdadonapogostick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thread
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses the character FranzBear and his interactions with Uncle Artman, referencing a historical context within the Physics Forums community. Participants share anecdotes and memories related to past threads, particularly focusing on the humorous and chaotic nature of discussions surrounding FranzBear's supposed immortality and the various antics of Uncle Artman. The conversation touches on themes of nostalgia, community lore, and the evolution of forum interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express excitement about the return of FranzBear, suggesting he will never die.
  • Others reminisce about the chaotic history of the original thread, noting its length and the difficulty in keeping up with the posts.
  • A participant mentions the humorous premise of Moonbear being the mother of a mutant immortal zombie named FranzBear.
  • There are claims about the various attempts by Uncle Artman to "kill" FranzBear, with some participants asserting that they have contributed to this narrative.
  • Some participants express a desire to revisit the original thread and share their experiences of reading it.
  • There are references to other threads and community events, indicating a broader context of forum culture and interactions.
  • Discussions about the "thread killers" and the nature of past threads suggest a playful rivalry among participants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share a sense of nostalgia and humor regarding the character of FranzBear and the associated threads. However, there are competing views on the significance and quality of the original posts, with some participants defending the original premise against claims of it being "drivel." The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall impact and legacy of these threads.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various historical threads and community events, indicating a rich background that may not be fully accessible to new members. There are mentions of deleted posts and edits that may affect the continuity of the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Members of the Physics Forums community, particularly those interested in forum culture, humor, and the history of discussions surrounding FranzBear and Uncle Artman.

  • #31
yourdadonapogostick said:
I've been off working on a nuclear prototype.

Um :rolleyes:, um :rolleyes:, um :rolleyes:, um :eek:

This just might be the most frightening post I've ever read!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Wonder if this will be as large? :smile:
 
  • #33
No. Because I already won.
 
  • #34
Math Jeans said:
No. Because I already won.

I must object to that hypothesis.
 
  • #35
BobG said:
Um :rolleyes:, um :rolleyes:, um :rolleyes:, um :eek:

This just might be the most frightening post I've ever read!

I'm done with that now. I'm about to go work on a brand new reactor.
 
  • #36
yourdadonapogostick said:
I'm done with that now. I'm about to go work on a brand new reactor.

What happened to the first actor? :rolleyes:
 
  • #37
It's shutdown undergoing routine maintenance at the moment.
 
  • #39
I have orders to the http://www.cvn77.navy.mil/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40
So who are the 2007 thread killers then?
 
  • #41
You were...an hour ago! ZING.
 
  • #42
math, it's 2008
 
  • #43
You can't say "who were the thread killers of 2008." It's a "look-back" type thing, you know?
 
  • #44
but we all know it will be me.
 
  • #45
whatever helps you sleep at night YDOAPS
 
  • #46
The problem with the thread killer thread is that everyone seems to overlook the sheer genius of the original post. It is a brilliant premise and I for one don't think people should get distracted by the next 700 pages of drivel.
 
  • #47
Drivel? Oh, wait. Nevermind.
 
  • #48
yourdadonapogostick said:
Drivel? Oh, wait. Nevermind.

I'm afraid that I have to reject that hypothesis, yet again.
 
  • #49
Guess whose back! Don't even think about it.
 
  • #50
Math Jeans said:
Guess whose back! Don't even think about it.

How can I guess if I'm not allowed to think?
 
  • #51
lisab said:
How can I guess if I'm not allowed to think?

Exactly.
 
  • #52
Math Jeans said:
lisab said:
How can I guess if I'm not allowed to think?
Exactly.

wow that is deep.
 
  • #53
rocketboy said:
wow that is deep.

Get over it. Mine.
 
  • #54
Math Jeans said:
Get over it. Mine.
Exactly.
 
  • #55
Mk said:
Exactly.

You will never defeat me!
 
  • #56
I am still trying to determine why I keep posting in this thread. So far my best answer is "procrastinating more important things".
 
  • #57
rocketboy said:
I am still trying to determine why I keep posting in this thread. So far my best answer is "procrastinating more important things".

Meh. Its mine. Leave it alone.
 
  • #58
What's yours?
 
  • #59
This thread.
 
  • #60
Jeans, give it up!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K