What is the length of a sector on a ring with radius R and angle dθ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPrint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the length of a sector on a ring with a given radius \( R \) and angle \( d\theta \). Participants are exploring the relationship between geometry and gravitational force in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for gravitational force and its application to point masses versus extended bodies. There is an exploration of integrating over the ring to find total force and the challenges of determining the limits and functions for integration.

Discussion Status

Some participants are questioning the correctness of certain formulas and assumptions regarding the length of the sector and its relation to mass. There is an ongoing exploration of the integration process and the implications of uniform mass distribution on the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential misunderstandings regarding the dimensions of formulas and the need for clarity on the relationship between the length of the sector and the mass of the ring. Participants are also grappling with the implications of using infinitesimally small segments in their calculations.

GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See Attachment

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so I understand for the radius, the distance from m to M would be (d^2+r^2)^(1/2)
but sense the formula for gravitation is a inverse square of the displacement in between the two bodies it would be

1/(R^2+d^2)

I don't understand why the answer is in terms of d/(R^2+d^2)^(3/2)
thanks for any help
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    9.3 KB · Views: 563
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula [itex]F = \frac{G M m}{r^2}[/itex], where [itex]r[/itex] is the distance between the bodies is valid only for point masses (We use it when calculating planetary motion because the size of the planets are so small compared to the distances between them that they can be approximated to be point masses).

In this case only one object is a point mass. The other is not.

The solution can be found by finding the force on the mass m due to an infinitesimally small point mass on the ring, and the integrating over the whole ring to find the total force.
 
I would like to grasp a good understanding of these types of problems...

So I have to integrate...
well... any infinity small point on the ring is a distance sqrt(d^2 + r^2)...
um so... an infinity small point mass on the ring dM...
um I'm not exactly sure what to do or what function I'm integrating...
I'm not exactly sure what the limits of the integral would be... hm...

I'm not really sure what to do
 
GreenPrint said:
well... any infinity small point on the ring is a distance sqrt(d^2 + r^2)...
Correct.

To find the mass of a very small part of the ring, consider the length of that part and the fact that the mass distribution of the ring is uniform.
 
well length of a sector is r^2/2 * angle (I actually had to look that one up)
if the angle becomes infinity small the length of the sector would be r^2/2 dtheta

so the length of the whole ring can be expressed as

1/2 * integral[0,2pi] R^2 dtheta

so a very small piece of the ring has a length of R^2/2 dtheta and is a distance of sqrt(R^2 + d^2)

I notice that both these quantities are in terms of R...

I don't see how the length of a section of the ring is related to the mass...
 
GreenPrint said:
well length of a sector is r^2/2 * angle
This cannot be correct. Look at the dimensions of (r^2/2*angle).

GreenPrint said:
if the angle becomes infinity small the length of the sector would be r^2/2 dtheta

so the length of the whole ring can be expressed as

1/2 * integral[0,2pi] R^2 dtheta
You have the right idea about using integration to find the total length (circumference) of the ring here, but you need to find the correct expression for the length of the sector.

GreenPrint said:
I don't see how the length of a section of the ring is related to the mass...
Consider the fact that the ring has a uniform mass distribution. If it's M for the total length of the ring, what is it going to be for the length of the section?
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K