What is the Limit of (1-cos(x))/x as x approaches 0?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of the expression (x*sin(x)) / (2 - 2*cos(x)) as x approaches 0. Participants are exploring techniques to handle indeterminate forms and the behavior of trigonometric functions near zero.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to manipulate the expression by multiplying by x/x to separate terms involving sin(x) and (1-cos(x)). Others question the behavior of the limit as x approaches 0, particularly regarding the indeterminate form of x/(1-cos(x)).

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods, including the application of l'Hopital's rule and Taylor series expansion. Some participants express confusion about the limits of certain components, while others suggest alternative approaches to simplify the expression.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as the prohibition of using l'Hopital's rule in some cases, and there is a recognition of the potential for misunderstanding the limits of trigonometric expressions as x approaches 0.

icosane
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



lim (x*sin(x)) / (2-2*cos(x)
x-> 0


The Attempt at a Solution



I remember the trick to these is to get sinx/x and (1-cosx)/x by multiplying by x/x...

When I multiply the expression by x/x I end up with (x^2 sinx)/(2x(1-cosx))
The sinx/x goes to 1, but the x/(1-cos(x)) goes to zero right? Wouldn't that make the whole expression go to zero, as the separate limits are multiplied together? The book says the answer is one...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x/(1 - cos(x)) is indeterminate (of the form [0/0]), so you can't just say that it's approaching 0 as x approaches 0.
 
You need to apply l'Hopital's rule, that is, to differentiate the numerator and denominator of the expression separately, i.e.:

f/g -> f'/g'

and look at the limit x->0, if it still doesn't work (which is actually the case in this problem) you do it again and check if it gives you a finite value (and you go on until it works).

In this case you first get:

[sin(x) + x*cos(x)]/[2*sin(x)]

which is still nasty as sin(0)=0, then you get:

[2*cos(x) - x*sin(x)]/[2*cos(x)]

which gives you 1 for x=0, you can confirm that by plotting the function (see attached picture).

---
 

Attachments

  • limit.png
    limit.png
    5.4 KB · Views: 387
Last edited by a moderator:
icosane said:

Homework Statement



lim (x*sin(x)) / (2-2*cos(x)
x-> 0


The Attempt at a Solution



I remember the trick to these is to get sinx/x and (1-cosx)/x by multiplying by x/x...

When I multiply the expression by x/x I end up with (x^2 sinx)/(2x(1-cosx))
The sinx/x goes to 1, but the x/(1-cos(x)) goes to zero right? Wouldn't that make the whole expression go to zero, as the separate limits are multiplied together? The book says the answer is one...
The answer is clearly NOT one! Write it as
[tex]\frac{1}{2} sin(x) \frac{x}{1- cos(x)}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{x}{1- cos(x)}[/tex]
goes to 1 but the remaining sin(x) goes to 0.
 
One can try putting this expression into Mathematica:

Code:
Limit[x*Sin[x]/(2 - 2*Cos[x]), x -> 0]

the answer is 1.

---
 

Attachments

  • notebook.PNG
    notebook.PNG
    2.6 KB · Views: 446
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
The answer is clearly NOT one! Write it as
[tex]\frac{1}{2} sin(x) \frac{x}{1- cos(x)}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{x}{1- cos(x)}[/tex]
goes to 1 but the remaining sin(x) goes to 0.

Oh, dear, how stupid of me!
[tex]\frac{x}{1- cos(x)}[/tex]
goes to 0, not 1 so this is of the form "0/0". The limit is NOT 0 as I asserted!

You need to use L'Hopital's rule repeatedly, as everyone else has been saying.
 
[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{x}{1- cos(x)}[/tex]
doesn't go to 0 either, but its reciprocal does.
 
If you're not allowed to use l'Hopital, which I never was, Taylor expand the numerator and denominator up to second order.
 
Last edited:
You don't have to use L'Hopital's rule or Taylor series. You were on the right track with trying to get fractions with x in the denominator. After factoring out the 2, you get

[tex]\frac {xsinx} {1 - cosx}[/tex]

multiply by [tex]\frac {1/x} {1/x}[/tex] to get [tex]\frac {sinx} {\frac {1 - cosx} {x}}[/tex]

Since
[tex]\frac{1 - cosx}{x}[/tex]
leaves us with 0 in the denominator, do something with 1 - cosx to get sinx/x.
 
  • #10
Bohrok said:
You don't have to use L'Hopital's rule or Taylor series. You were on the right track with trying to get fractions with x in the denominator. After factoring out the 2, you get

[tex]\frac {xsinx} {1 - cosx}[/tex]

multiply by [tex]\frac {1/x} {1/x}[/tex] to get [tex]\frac {sinx} {\frac {1 - cosx} {x}}[/tex]

Since
[tex]\frac{1 - cosx}{x}[/tex]
leaves us with 0 in the denominator, do something with 1 - cosx to get sinx/x.

Thanks guys! I found this problem in a textbook in a chapter before L'Hopital's rule was covered.

Bohrok, I think I can see that if I multiply by (1+cosx) / (1+cosx) That the resulting expression can be manipulated using the trig identity 1 - cos(x)^2 = sin(x)^2 and then everything falls into place.

I just realized that my assumption that (1-cos(x))/x goes to 0 as x goes to 0 is wrong. Does it go to infinity by any chance?
 
  • #11
I'm glad you got it. :smile:

icosane said:
I just realized that my assumption that (1-cos(x))/x goes to 0 as x goes to 0 is wrong. Does it go to infinity by any chance?

No, (1-cos(x))/x does go to 0 as x goes to 0 as I said earlier (but its reciprocal goes to infinity). To find the limit of just (1-cos(x))/x instead of
https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/22/2221609-2.png
multiply (1-cos(x))/x by (1+cosx) / (1+cosx) and then evaluate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K