What is the magnitude of the force on each charge in a square arrangement?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the magnitude of the force on charges arranged at the corners of a square, specifically with each charge being 5.00 mC and the square having a side length of 0.100 m. The formula used for the calculation is F = (kq1q2)/r², where k = 9 x 10^9. The initial calculations yielded a total force of 43.07 N on charge Q2, but errors were identified regarding the distances used in the calculations, particularly the diagonal distance between charges. The correct interpretation of the charge unit 'mC' as milliCoulombs (10^-3) rather than microCoulombs (10^-6) was also clarified.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electrostatic forces
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem for calculating distances
  • Knowledge of charge units, specifically milliCoulombs (mC) and microCoulombs (μC)
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations and performing calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Coulomb's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Learn how to calculate distances in geometric arrangements using the Pythagorean theorem
  • Study the implications of different charge units and their conversions
  • Explore vector addition of forces in electrostatic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to forces between point charges in geometric configurations.

rawrlen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charge of 5.00 mC is placed at each corner of a square 0.100 m on a side.

Determine the magnitude of the force on each charge.

Homework Equations


F= (kq1q2)/r2

k= 9*10^9

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew 4 charges in a square .1m apart from each other, then used the formula above.

Q1 Q2

Q3 Q4

I did the calculation for Q2 (figuring they all should be the same):

F(2 due to 1) = [(9*10^9)(5*10^-6)^2]/(.01) = 22.5 N
F(2 due to 4) = [(9*10^9)(5*10^-6)^2]/(.01) = 22.5 N
F(2 due to 3) = [(9*10^9)(5*10^-6)^2]/(.02) = 11.25 N

Then:

Ftotal = (\sqrt{(22.5^2+22.5^2}) + 11.25 = 43.07 N

Did I do this wrong? Or is the distance from each charge not .1 m?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rawrlen said:


I did the calculation for Q2 (figuring they all should be the same):

F(2 due to 1) = [(9*10^9)(5*10^-6)^2]/(.01) = 22.5 N
F(2 due to 4) = [(9*10^9)(5*10^-6)^2]/(.01) = 22.5 N
F(2 due to 3) = [(9*10^9)(5*10^-6)^2]/(.02) = 11.25 N

Then:

Ftotal = (\sqrt{(22.5^2+22.5^2}) + 11.25 = 43.07 N

Did I do this wrong? Or is the distance from each charge not .1 m?


You seem to have forgotten to square the distances between charges. Also, think again about what the distance between Q2 and Q3 is. The length of the diagonal of a square is not just double the length of each side.
 
I did square the dist between charges, .1^2 = .01

You're right Q2 to Q3 is not the double of the length of the sides, I used Pythagorean theorem and squared both sides and took the sqrt of that;

.1^2 + .1^2 = .02

sqrt .02 = .1414

but the dist. needed to be squared for the formula so .1414^2 = .02

lmk if I have mistaken what you posted, and thanks for the reply
 
rawrlen said:
I did square the dist between charges, .1^2 = .01

You're right Q2 to Q3 is not the double of the length of the sides, I used Pythagorean theorem and squared both sides and took the sqrt of that;

.1^2 + .1^2 = .02

sqrt .02 = .1414

but the dist. needed to be squared for the formula so .1414^2 = .02

lmk if I have mistaken what you posted, and thanks for the reply

Sorry i read the length of the sides as 0.01m instead of 0.1m; my mistake :smile:
 
No worries :). Any more suggestions?
 
Figured it out... mC does not mean micro it means MILLA! 10^-3 instead of 10^-6
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K